Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Zebra AP 6511 vs Zebra Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 3identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • AP 6511:10,100 Mbit/s
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Frequency band
    • AP 6511:2.4, 5 GHz
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:5.18 - 5.825 GHz
  • Antenna gain level (max)
    • AP 6511:4.5 dBi
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:1 dBi
  • Weight
    • AP 6511:340 g
    • Motorola AP-6521-60010-US wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:910 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AP 6511, AP-6521-60010-US
40 specifications
Features3 differ
2.4 GHzKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
5 GHzKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Frequency bandDiffers2.4, 5 GHz5.18 - 5.825 GHz
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3afIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
MIMOKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
VLAN supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 GHz
Spread spectrum methodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDSSS
ModulationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOFDM
Transmitting powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source27 dBmW
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one128-bit AES, 128-bit WEP, EAP, WPA-TKIP, WPA2Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Management protocolsKnown for oneSSH, HTTPS, SNMP v3Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one12.95 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one36 VDC / 57 VDCUnknown — not stated by the source
Antenna1 differ
Antennas quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna gain level (max)Differs4.5 dBi1 dBi
Antenna featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntegrated antenna
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC 15.247, 15.407 / EN300 328, EN 301 893; UL EU EN 60950-1 2nd Ed., ANZ C-Tick, UL 2043; FCC Part 15 Subpart B, EN 55022: 2006 + A1: 2007, ICES – 003 (Class B) EN 55024: 1998 + A1: 2001 + A2: 2003; EU RoHS Directive 2002/95/EC; CE, IC, FCCUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one124 x 70 x 29 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers340 g910 g
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source241.3 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source189.2 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43.6 mm
Other featuresidentical
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one1, 2, 5.5, 11, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54, 300 MbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Power LEDKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
SafetyKnown for oneRoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmit power rangeKnown for one6 - 24 dBmWUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 2438 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one-40 - 70%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons