Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Zebra Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs Zebra Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s

12specifications compared
10differ
2identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):300 Mbit/s
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:100 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data rates
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):10,100,1000 Mbit/s
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:10,100 Mbit/s
Frequency band
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):2.4 - 5 GHz
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:2.4 GHz
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):1
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:2
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):141 x 216.4 x 37.71 mm
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:95 x 44 x 170 mm
Weight
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):1.14 kg
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:340 g
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):5 - 95%
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE):0 - 50 °C
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:0 - 40 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AP-0650-60020-WW, MC-802
27 specifications	A Zebra Motorola AP-0650-60020-WW 300 Mbit/s Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model AP-0650-60020-WW View product	B Zebra Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s Model MC-802 View product
Features4 differ
2.4 GHz	Yes	Yes
5 GHzKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	300 Mbit/s	100 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,100 Mbit/s
Frequency bandDiffers	2.4 - 5 GHz	2.4 GHz
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3af	IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3
MIMOKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DSSS, OFDM, QAM
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	1	2
WAN connection	Ethernet (RJ-45)	Ethernet (RJ-45)
DC-in jackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	12.95 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	802.3af supply: 48 VDC @ 12.95W (typical), 36 VDC to 57 VDC (range)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennaidentical
Antennas quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one	24 dBi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffers	EN 301 489-1, EN 301 489-17, IEC 60601-1-2, EN 55022, FCC 15 B, ICES 003 B, EN 55024, EN 61000-3-2, EN 61000-3-3 EN 50385, FCC Part 2, OET Bulletin 65, RSS-102 Issue 2	FCC 15.247/ETS 300 328, CE, TUV EN60950, ANZ C-Tick, FCC Part15A, EN 5022: 1994/A1:1995/A2:Class A EN 55024:1998:Class A, CISPR 22, RoHS 2002/EC/95
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	141 x 216.4 x 37.71 mm	95 x 44 x 170 mm
WeightDiffers	1.14 kg	340 g
Other featuresidentical
SafetyKnown for one	UL 60950, cUL, EU EN 60950, TUV and UL 2043	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 95%	5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 50 °C	0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one	0 - 2438 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, TKIP, WEP, WPA, WPA2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons