Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

EnGenius EOC-3220 EXT vs Linksys RE1000 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s

10specifications compared
4differ
6identical
30known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- EOC-3220 EXT:54 Mbit/s
- RE1000 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:300 Mbit/s
Power supply type
- EOC-3220 EXT:VDC
- RE1000 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:AC/DC
Wireless technology
- EOC-3220 EXT:IEEE802.11b/g
- RE1000 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s:Wireless-N

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EOC-3220 EXT, RE1000
40 specifications	A EnGenius EOC-3220 EXT View product	B Linksys RE1000 wireless access point 300 Mbit/s Model RE1000 View product
Features1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	54 Mbit/s	300 Mbit/s
Channels quantityKnown for one	14 channels	Unknown — not stated by the source
ModulationKnown for one	16-QAM, 64-QAM, BPSK, OFDM, QPSK	Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one	802.11g: -88dBm @ 6Mbps -70dBm @ 54Mbps 802.11b: -92 dBm @ 1Mbps -85 dBm @ 11Mbps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.3u
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100Base-T(X)
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	802.1x RADIUS, EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, MD5, SSID, WPA, WPA2	Unknown — not stated by the source
MAC address filteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
DHCP serverKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
DHCP clientKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management protocolsKnown for one	SNMP V1, V2c	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
WAN connectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet (RJ-45)
Power1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	48 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one	0.375 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeDiffers	VDC	AC/DC
Antennaidentical
Antenna connector typeKnown for one	SMA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	FCC, CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	135.2 x 163.8 x 47 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	1.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one	1, 2, 5.5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 Mbps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsDiffers	IEEE802.11b/g, IEEE802.1x, IEEE802.3, IEEE802.3u	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11a
Transmit power rangeKnown for one	20 - 26 dBmW	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless technologyDiffers	IEEE802.11b/g	Wireless-N
Connectivity LEDsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 65 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 80 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
InternalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows XP SP3 Windows Vista SP1+ Windows 7 Mac OS X Leopard 10.5 Mac OS X Snow Leopard 10.6
Minimum system requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IE 7.0+ Safari 4+ Firefox 3+

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons