Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

EnGenius EOA3630 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s vs EnGenius EOC-1650 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s

20specifications compared
4differ
16identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

Security algorithms
- EOA3630 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s:WEP, WPA-PSK
- EOC-1650 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s:WEP, WPA, WPA2
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- EOA3630 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s:260 x 175 x 65 mm
- EOC-1650 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s:48 x 192 x 36.2 mm
Weight
- EOA3630 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s:680 g
- EOC-1650 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s:250 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EOA3630, EOC-1650
24 specifications	A EnGenius EOA3630 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Model EOA3630 View product	B EnGenius EOC-1650 wireless access point 54 Mbit/s Model EOC-1650 View product
Features1 differ
Receiver sensitivityDiffers	IEEE 802.11g 6Mbps @ -92dBm 54Mbps @ -74dBm IEEE 802.11b 1Mbps @ -97dBm 11Mbps @ -89dBm Available Transmit Power (Average): IEEE 802.11g 27dBm @ 6~24Mbps 25dBm @ 36Mbps 23dBm @ 48Mbps 22dBm @ 54Mbps IEEE 802.11b 28dBm @ 1~11Mbps	IEEE 802.11g 6Mbps @ -92dBm 54Mbps @ -74dBm IEEE 802.11b 1Mbps @ -97dBm 11Mbps @ -89dBm Available Transmit Power (Average): IEEE 802.11g 23dBm @ 6~24Mbps 21dBm @ 36Mbps 19dBm @ 48Mbps 18dBm @ 54Mbps IEEE 802.11b 24dBm @ 1~11Mbps
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	WEP, WPA-PSK	WEP, WPA, WPA2
VPN supportKnown for one	IPsec, L2TP, PPTP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennaidentical
Antenna connector typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RP-SMA
Performanceidentical
Flash memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 MB
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	260 x 175 x 65 mm	48 x 192 x 36.2 mm
WeightDiffers	680 g	250 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons