Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE)

22specifications compared
15differ
7identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

The Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 4,024 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (4324 Mbit/s vs 300 Mbit/s). The Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 388 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz) than the Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (688 Mbit/s vs 300 Mbit/s). The Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (2 vs 1). Only the Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 5 GHz. Security algorithms: CCMP, TKIP, WPA-PSK, WPA2 on the Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE), WEP, WPA, WPA2, WPA3 on the Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE).

5 GHz
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):No
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Yes
Maximum data transfer rate
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):300 Mbit/s
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):4324 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz)
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):300 Mbit/s
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):688 Mbit/s
Security algorithms
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):CCMP, TKIP, WPA-PSK, WPA2
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):WEP, WPA, WPA2, WPA3
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):1
AC input voltage
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):220 V
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):100 - 240 V
Output current
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):0.25 A
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):1.5 A
Placement
- PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Wall
- NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Ceiling

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PFM885-I, NWA90BE
51 specifications	A Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model PFM885-I View product	B Zyxel NWA90BE 4324 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) Model NWA90BE View product
Features3 differ
5 GHzDiffers	No	Yes
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	300 Mbit/s	4324 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz)Differs	300 Mbit/s	688 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4324 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000,2500 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11be, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3at, IEEE 802.3bt
MIMOKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
MIMO typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Multi User MIMO
Wi-Fi Multimedia (WMM)/(WME)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Fast roamingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
VLAN supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one	11b: -97dBm@ 1Mbps; 11g: -94dBm@6Mbps; 11n: -72dBm@MCS7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	CCMP, TKIP, WPA-PSK, WPA2	WEP, WPA, WPA2, WPA3
Auto Wireless Distribution System (WDS)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
MAC address filteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
IP address filteringKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Cloud-managedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	2	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power2 differ
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers	220 V	100 - 240 V
Input currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.3 A
Output currentDiffers	0.25 A	1.5 A
Output voltageKnown for one	48 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one	8 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
PlacementDiffers	Wall	Ceiling
Antenna1 differ
Antenna gain level (max)Differs	6 dBi	3 dBi
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	32 mm	150 mm
HeightDiffers	150 mm	35 mm
WeightDiffers	500 g	412 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	244 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	168 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	785 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mounting kitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	5 - 95%	10 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	-30 - 70 °C	0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-40 - 80 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	TCP/UDP/ARP/ICMP/DHCP/HTTP/NTP	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons