Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

D-Link RangeBooster N 650 vs NETGEAR WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 9identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • RangeBooster N 650:300 Mbit/s
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:150 Mbit/s
  • Frequency band
    • RangeBooster N 650:2.4 - 2.497 GHz
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:2.4 GHz
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • RangeBooster N 650:1
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:4
  • WAN connection
    • RangeBooster N 650:Wi-Fi
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:Ethernet (RJ-45)
  • LED indicators
    • RangeBooster N 650:LAN, Power, Status, WLAN
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:Power, Yes
  • Internal
    • RangeBooster N 650:No
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:Yes
  • Antennas quantity
    • RangeBooster N 650:3
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:1
  • Certification
    • RangeBooster N 650:FCC Class B, CE, IC, C-Tick
    • WN2000RPT-100NA wireless access point 150 Mbit/s:CEC, RoHS, WEEE

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of RangeBooster N 650, WN2000RPT-100NA
41 specifications
Features2 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers300 Mbit/s150 Mbit/s
Frequency bandDiffers2.4 - 2.497 GHz2.4 GHz
Spread spectrum methodKnown for oneCSS, DSSSUnknown — not stated by the source
ModulationKnown for one16-QAM, 64-QAM, BPSK, CCK, DBPSK, DQPSK, OFDMUnknown — not stated by the source
VLAN supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers128-bit WEP, 64-bit WEP, WPA, WPA2WEP, WPA, WPA-PSK, WPA2, WPA2-PSK, WPS
MAC address filteringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneSNMP, Telnet, SSL/SSHUnknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers14
WAN connectionDiffersWi-FiEthernet (RJ-45)
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one9 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC/DC
Design2 differ
LED indicatorsDiffersLAN, Power, Status, WLANPower, Yes
InternalDiffersNoYes
Antenna1 differ
Antenna featuresKnown for oneDetachable antennaUnknown — not stated by the source
Antennas quantityDiffers31
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one3 dBiUnknown — not stated by the source
Antenna connector typeKnown for oneRP-SMAUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersFCC Class B, CE, IC, C-TickCEC, RoHS, WEEE
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs120 x 198 x 32 mm177.5 x 130 x 35 mm
WeightDiffers325 g680 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC, LAN (RJ-45)
Other features1 differ
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 270, 300Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.11b/g/nUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless technologyDiffers802.11b/g/n802.11 b/g/n
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 65 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows Mac
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceInternet Explorer 5.0 Firefox 2.0 Safari 1.4

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons