Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs NETGEAR WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE)

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 11identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 1,082 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the NETGEAR WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (2882 Mbit/s vs 1800 Mbit/s). The D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 88 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz) than the NETGEAR WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (688 Mbit/s vs 600 Mbit/s). The D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 1,682 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz) than the NETGEAR WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (2882 Mbit/s vs 1200 Mbit/s). Frequency band: 2.4 - 5.85 GHz on the D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE), 2.5 - 5 GHz on the NETGEAR WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE). Placement: Ceiling on the D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE), Desk on the NETGEAR WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE).

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2882 Mbit/s
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):1800 Mbit/s
  • Maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz)
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):688 Mbit/s
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):600 Mbit/s
  • Maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz)
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2882 Mbit/s
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):1200 Mbit/s
  • Frequency band
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2.4 - 5.85 GHz
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2.5 - 5 GHz
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):1
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):4
  • Placement
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Ceiling
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Desk
  • LED indicators
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Power, Status, Link, Wi-Fi
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Network, Power, Status
  • Width
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):186 mm
    • WAX610W 1800 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):110 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DAP-E3620, WAX610W
49 specifications
Features5 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers2882 Mbit/s1800 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz)Differs688 Mbit/s600 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz)Differs2882 Mbit/s1200 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one2500 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandDiffers2.4 - 5.85 GHz2.5 - 5 GHz
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.11be, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3bz, IEEE 802.3atIEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n, IEEE 802.3af
Band steeringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Spread spectrum methodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOFDM, OFDMA
Fast roamingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffersWPA, WPA2, WPA3, 802.1x RADIUS, AES, WPA-Personal, WPA-Enterprise, WPA3-Personal, WPA3-EnterpriseEAP, TLS, TTLS
Service Set Identifier (SSID) featuresKnown for oneSSID broadcastUnknown — not stated by the source
Guest accessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
SyslogKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers14
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
Poweridentical
DC voltage rangeKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Input currentKnown for one2.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Known for one14.17 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source54 V
Output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.2 A
Design2 differ
PlacementDiffersCeilingDesk
Reset buttonKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersPower, Status, Link, Wi-FiNetwork, Power, Status
Antennaidentical
Antennas quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna gain level (max)Known for one4 dBiUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers186 mm110 mm
DepthDiffers186 mm130 mm
HeightDiffers37 mm34.2 mm
WeightDiffers550 g380 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 65 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons