Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) vs Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE)

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 7identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 2,582 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (2882 Mbit/s vs 300 Mbit/s). The D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 388 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz) than the Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (688 Mbit/s vs 300 Mbit/s). The Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) (2 vs 1). Only the D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE) has 5 GHz. Placement: Ceiling on the D-Link DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE), Wall on the Dahua Technology PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE).

  • 5 GHz
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Yes
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):No
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2882 Mbit/s
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):300 Mbit/s
  • Maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz)
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):688 Mbit/s
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):300 Mbit/s
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):1
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):2
  • Power consumption (max)
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):14.17 W
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):8 W
  • Placement
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Ceiling
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):Wall
  • Antenna gain level (max)
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):4 dBi
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):6 dBi
  • Width
    • DAP-E3620 wireless access point 2882 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):186 mm
    • PFM885-I 300 Mbit/s White Power over Ethernet (PoE):150 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DAP-E3620, PFM885-I
48 specifications
Features3 differ
2.4 GHzYesYes
5 GHzDiffersYesNo
6 GHzNoNo
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers2882 Mbit/s300 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (2.4 GHz)Differs688 Mbit/s300 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz)Known for one2882 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one2500 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 - 5.85 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11be, IEEE 802.11ax, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3bz, IEEE 802.3atUnknown — not stated by the source
MIMOKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
MIMO typeKnown for oneMulti User MIMOUnknown — not stated by the source
Band steeringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver sensitivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11b: -97dBm@ 1Mbps; 11g: -94dBm@6Mbps; 11n: -72dBm@MCS7
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffersWPA, WPA2, WPA3, 802.1x RADIUS, AES, WPA-Personal, WPA-Enterprise, WPA3-Personal, WPA3-EnterpriseCCMP, TKIP, WPA-PSK, WPA2
MAC address filteringYesYes
Service Set Identifier (SSID) featuresKnown for oneSSID broadcastUnknown — not stated by the source
Auto Wireless Distribution System (WDS)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
IP address filteringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
SyslogKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power over Ethernet (PoE)YesYes
DC voltage range12 V12 V
Input currentKnown for one2.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (max)Differs14.17 W8 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 V
Output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48 V
Output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.25 A
Design1 differ
PlacementDiffersCeilingWall
Product colourWhiteWhite
Reset buttonKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for onePower, Status, Link, Wi-FiUnknown — not stated by the source
Antenna1 differ
Antenna typeInternalInternal
Antennas quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna gain level (max)Differs4 dBi6 dBi
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers186 mm150 mm
DepthDiffers186 mm32 mm
HeightDiffers37 mm150 mm
WeightDiffers550 g500 g
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Operational conditions3 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 90%5 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C-30 - 70 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 65 °C-40 - 80 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCP/UDP/ARP/ICMP/DHCP/HTTP/NTP

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons