Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Buffalo AirStation 300 Mbit/s vs Zebra Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s

10specifications compared
7differ
3identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- AirStation 300 Mbit/s:300 Mbit/s
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:100 Mbit/s
Frequency band
- AirStation 300 Mbit/s:2.4, 5 GHz
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:2.4 GHz
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- AirStation 300 Mbit/s:71 x 101.6 x 40.6 mm
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:95 x 44 x 170 mm
Weight
- AirStation 300 Mbit/s:156 g
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:340 g
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- AirStation 300 Mbit/s:20 - 80%
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)
- AirStation 300 Mbit/s:5 - 35 °C
- Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s:0 - 40 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AirStation, MC-802
32 specifications	A Buffalo AirStation 300 Mbit/s Model AirStation View product	B Zebra Motorola MC-802 100 Mbit/s Model MC-802 View product
Features2 differ
2.4 GHz	Yes	Yes
5 GHzKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	300 Mbit/s	100 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data rates	10,100 Mbit/s	10,100 Mbit/s
Frequency bandDiffers	2.4, 5 GHz	2.4 GHz
Cabling technologyKnown for one	10/100BASE-T(X)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Channels quantityKnown for one	2 channels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.1x, IEEE 802.3
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	DSSS, OFDM, QAM
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	128-bit WEP, 64-bit WEP, WPA, WPA2	EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, TKIP, WEP, WPA, WPA2
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	IEEE802.3u, IEEE802.3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports	2	2
WAN connectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ethernet (RJ-45)
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	7.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	100 - 240V/50 - 60Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power supply typeKnown for one	AC/DC	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	LAN, WLAN	Unknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennaidentical
Antennas quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 7 (32bit/64bit), Windows Vista (32bit/64bit), Windows XP, Windows 2000, Mac OS X 10.4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	71 x 101.6 x 40.6 mm	95 x 44 x 170 mm
WeightDiffers	156 g	340 g
Other featuresidentical
Rack mountingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Size (imperial)Known for one	7.11 cm (2.8")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless technologyKnown for one	Wi-Fi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity LEDsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wireless standardKnown for one	IEEE802.11a, IEEE802.11n, IEEE802.11g, IEEE802.11b	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	20 - 80%	5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 35 °C	0 - 40 °C
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC 15.247/ETS 300 328, CE, TUV EN60950, ANZ C-Tick, FCC Part15A, EN 5022: 1994/A1:1995/A2:Class A EN 55024:1998:Class A, CISPR 22, RoHS 2002/EC/95

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons