Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

ASUS EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s vs Zebra AP 7502E

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum data transfer rate
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:1750 Mbit/s
- AP 7502E:300 Mbit/s
Frequency band
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:5 GHz
- AP 7502E:2.4 - 5.85 GHz
Security algorithms
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:WPA2-PSK, WPS, WPA-PSK
- AP 7502E:802.1x RADIUS, WPA2
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:5
- AP 7502E:4
Width
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:160 mm
- AP 7502E:95 mm
Depth
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:160 mm
- AP 7502E:90 mm
Height
- EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s:40 mm
- AP 7502E:35 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EA-AC87, AP 7502E
36 specifications	A ASUS EA-AC87 1750 Mbit/s Model EA-AC87 View product	B Zebra AP 7502E View product
Features3 differ
2.4 GHzKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
5 GHz	Yes	Yes
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	1750 Mbit/s	300 Mbit/s
Maximum data transfer rate (5 GHz)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	867 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN data rates	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Frequency bandDiffers	5 GHz	2.4 - 5.85 GHz
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.11ac	IEEE 802.11a, IEEE 802.11ac, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11i, IEEE 802.11n
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Transmitting powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 dBmW
Wi-Fi data rate (max)Known for one	1750 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
ModulationKnown for one	16-QAM, 256-QAM, 64-QAM, BPSK, QPSK	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security1 differ
Security algorithmsDiffers	WPA2-PSK, WPS, WPA-PSK	802.1x RADIUS, WPA2
Security featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stateful packet inspection (SPI), Network address translation (NAT), WIPS
IP address filteringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Protocolsidentical
DHCP serverKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DHCP clientKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Supported protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	- EN 55022, FCC Part 15, ICES 003, EU RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU, EN 55024: 2003, EN 55024: 2010 + A2, EN 55024: 2010 + A1 - UL EU EN 60950-1 2nd Ed., ANZ RCM - FCC 15.247, 15.407
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	5	4
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7 W
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	White
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Activity
Internal	No	No
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	160 mm	95 mm
DepthDiffers	160 mm	90 mm
HeightDiffers	40 mm	35 mm
WeightKnown for one	480 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Antennaidentical
Antenna featuresKnown for one	Detachable antenna	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antennas quantityKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Antenna connector typeKnown for one	SMA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 8.1 Windows 8 Windows 7 Windows Vista Windows XP Mac OS X 10.1 Mac OS X 10.4 Mac OS X 10.5 Mac OS X 10.6 Mac OS X 10.7 Mac OS X 10.8 Linux	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	CE, FCC, C-Tick, NCC, Wi-Fi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons