Product comparison · 2 wireless access points

Allied Telesis WLAN AccessPoint vs D-Link RangeBooster N 650 Router

Add a product
  • 5specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 2identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The D-Link RangeBooster N 650 Router has 46 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the Allied Telesis WLAN AccessPoint (100 Mbit/s vs 54 Mbit/s). Dimensions (WxDxH): 155.5 x 105.5 x 26 mm on the Allied Telesis WLAN AccessPoint, 116.84 x 193.04 x 30.48 mm on the D-Link RangeBooster N 650 Router.

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • WLAN AccessPoint:54 Mbit/s
    • RangeBooster N 650 Router:100 Mbit/s
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • WLAN AccessPoint:155.5 x 105.5 x 26 mm
    • RangeBooster N 650 Router:116.84 x 193.04 x 30.48 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of WLAN AccessPoint, RangeBooster N 650 Router
32 specifications
Features1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers54 Mbit/s100 Mbit/s
Cabling technologyKnown for one10/100Base-T(X)Unknown — not stated by the source
Quality of Service (QoS) supportYesYes
Receiver sensitivityKnown for one15dBm typically @ IEEE 802.11b, 12dBm typically @ IEEE 802.11gUnknown — not stated by the source
Channels quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 channels
Securityidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneWEPUnknown — not stated by the source
MAC address filteringKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocols1 differ
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP serverKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneTCP/UDP/ICMP/ARPUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported protocolsDiffersCSMA/CA, ACKIEEE 802.11n IEEE 802.11g IEEE 802.11b IEEE 802.3 IEEE 802.3u
Management featuresidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneRJ-45Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Poweridentical
Power requirementsKnown for one12 VDCUnknown — not stated by the source
Output power descriptionKnown for one13 dBmUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
InternalNoNo
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 2000, ME, XP, LinuxUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneFCC/EN55022 B, VCCI, CE, Wi-FiUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs155.5 x 105.5 x 26 mm116.84 x 193.04 x 30.48 mm
Other featuresidentical
Supported data transfer ratesKnown for one1, 2, 5.5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 24, 36, 48, 54 MbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Indoor rangeKnown for one120 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Outdoor rangeKnown for one300 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11gUnknown — not stated by the source
Frequency rangeKnown for one2400 - 2483.5 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity LEDsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one10 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wireless access point comparisons

All wireless access point comparisons