Product comparison · 2 wired routers

Digicom Michelangelo Office TX wired router vs Nilox 16NX081812001 wired router Black, Silver

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 7identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • Michelangelo Office TX wired router:4
    • 16NX081812001 wired router Black, Silver:1
  • Supported network protocols
    • Michelangelo Office TX wired router:RFC2364, RFC2516, RFC1483
    • 16NX081812001 wired router Black, Silver:DSCP, ToS, 801.1p
  • Certification
    • Michelangelo Office TX wired router:CE Mark
    • 16NX081812001 wired router Black, Silver:CE, RoHS, SFT, EMC
  • Power requirements
    • Michelangelo Office TX wired router:9VAC, 1A
    • 16NX081812001 wired router Black, Silver:220 V, 50/60 Hz, 0.09A
  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • Michelangelo Office TX wired router:0 Gbit/s
    • 16NX081812001 wired router Black, Silver:0.024 Gbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TX, 16NX081812001
39 specifications
Networkidentical
Networking standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.11b
Supports ISDN connectionNoNo
DSL features1 differ
ADSLYesYes
DSL specificationDiffersADSL2+, ADSL2, DELT, READSL2, ADSL Full-rate ANSI T1.413 Issue 2, G.dmt, G.lite, G.hsADSL2/2
Upstream data rateKnown for one1 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Downstream data rateKnown for one24 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Management featuresidentical
Quality of Service (QoS) supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Web-based managementKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers41
RJ-11 ports quantity11
USB ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DC-in jackKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for one1 x USBUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocols1 differ
DHCP serverYesYes
DMZ supportYesYes
Routing protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIP
Supported network protocolsDiffersRFC2364, RFC2516, RFC1483DSCP, ToS, 801.1p
DHCP clientKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
User Guide on CD-ROMKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Features1 differ
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 MB
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 MB
CertificationDiffersCE MarkCE, RoHS, SFT, EMC
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack, Silver
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power supplyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source800 g
Other features2 differ
Power requirementsDiffers9VAC, 1A220 V, 50/60 Hz, 0.09A
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source165 x 108 x 28 mm
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers0 Gbit/s0.024 Gbit/s
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source260 x 70 x 160 mm
Power supply typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
Supported WAN typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceANSI T1.413, ITU-T G.992.1, ITU-T G.992.2, ITU-T G.994.1, ITU-T G.992.3, ITU-T G.992.5, UNI 3.1/4.0. ATM 5-AAL5, ATM (RFC 1483) UBR, CBR, VBR-rt, VBR-ntr, PP, PPP
Connectivity LEDsYesYes
Securityidentical
Firewall securityKnown for oneStateful packet inspection (SPI) firewallUnknown — not stated by the source
Authentication methodKnown for onePAP, CHAPUnknown — not stated by the source
NAT functionalityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wired router comparisons

All wired router comparisons