Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

Candy Refrigerator CCV 150 vs Samsung RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s)

7specifications compared
6differ
1identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

The Candy Refrigerator CCV 150 has 75 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Samsung RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s) (313 kWh vs 238 kWh). The Samsung RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s) has 11 mm more width than the Candy Refrigerator CCV 150 (511 mm vs 500 mm). The Samsung RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s) has 2 mm more depth than the Candy Refrigerator CCV 150 (550 mm vs 548 mm). Product colour: Black, Chrome on the Candy Refrigerator CCV 150, Black on the Samsung RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s).

Product colour
- Refrigerator CCV 150:Black, Chrome
- RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s):Black
Annual energy consumption
- Refrigerator CCV 150:313 kWh
- RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s):238 kWh
Width
- Refrigerator CCV 150:500 mm
- RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s):511 mm
Depth
- Refrigerator CCV 150:548 mm
- RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s):550 mm
Height
- Refrigerator CCV 150:840 mm
- RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s):850 mm
Weight
- Refrigerator CCV 150:30 kg
- RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s):37 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Refrigerator CCV 150, RW33EBSS
19 specifications	A Candy Refrigerator CCV 150 View product	B Samsung RW33EBSS wine cooler Freestanding 33 bottle(s) Model RW33EBSS View product
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Chrome	Black
Door hingeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Right
Reversible doorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Bottles capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33 bottle(s)
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	38 dB
Climate classKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total net capacityKnown for one	122 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Door open alarmKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	C
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	313 kWh	238 kWh
Energy usageKnown for one	0.86 kWh/24h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	500 mm	511 mm
DepthDiffers	548 mm	550 mm
HeightDiffers	840 mm	850 mm
WeightDiffers	30 kg	37 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	32 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wine cooler comparisons

All wine cooler comparisons