Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

Candy CWC 154 EEL/NFC vs Haier HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s)

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 15identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Candy CWC 154 EEL/NFC has 2 shelves more shelves than the Haier HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s) (7 shelves vs 5 shelves). The Candy CWC 154 EEL/NFC has 4 dB more noise level than the Haier HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s) (39 dB vs 35 dB). The Candy CWC 154 EEL/NFC has 62 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Haier HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s) (143 kWh vs 81 kWh). Bottles capacity: 41 bottle(s) on the Candy CWC 154 EEL/NFC, 209 bottle(s) on the Haier HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s). Climate class: N-ST on the Candy CWC 154 EEL/NFC, SN-ST on the Haier HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s).

  • Number of shelves
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:7 shelves
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):5 shelves
  • Bottles capacity
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:41 bottle(s)
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):209 bottle(s)
  • Climate class
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:N-ST
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):SN-ST
  • Noise emission class
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:C
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):B
  • Noise level
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:39 dB
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):35 dB
  • Energy efficiency class
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:G
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):D
  • Annual energy consumption
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:143 kWh
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):81 kWh
  • Current
    • CWC 154 EEL/NFC:0.8 A
    • HWS209FDH1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 209 bottle(s):0.79 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CWC 154 EEL/NFC, HWS209FDH1
40 specifications
Design1 differ
Appliance placementFreestandingFreestanding
Housing colourBlackBlack
Inner colourBlackBlack
Shelves materialWoodWood
Number of shelvesDiffers7 shelves5 shelves
Number of doors1 door(s)1 door(s)
Door hingeRightRight
Reversible doorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ultraviolet (UV) protectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Handle colourKnown for oneStainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
FrameKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance4 differ
Product typeCompressor wine coolerCompressor wine cooler
Bottles capacityDiffers41 bottle(s)209 bottle(s)
Number of temperature zones11
Climate classDiffersN-STSN-ST
Noise emission classDiffersCB
Noise levelDiffers39 dB35 dB
Temperature (max)Known for one38 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Temperature (min)Known for one16 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Freezeridentical
Built-in freezerNoNo
Ergonomicsidentical
Interior lightYesYes
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Lamp typeLEDLED
Wi-Fi controlledKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Apps supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcehOn
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersGD
Energy efficiency scaleA to GA to G
Annual energy consumptionDiffers143 kWh81 kWh
AC input voltage220-240 V220-240 V
AC input frequency50 Hz50 Hz
CurrentDiffers0.8 A0.79 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers490 mm603 mm
DepthDiffers545 mm647 mm
HeightDiffers845 mm1925 mm
WeightDiffers29 kg65 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers535 mm659 mm
Package depthDiffers585 mm644 mm
Package heightDiffers885 mm2015 mm
Package weightDiffers32 kg74 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wine cooler comparisons

All wine cooler comparisons