Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

Candy CWC 150 UK/N vs Whirlpool WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s)

Add a product
  • 30specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 14identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Candy CWC 150 UK/N has 5 shelves more shelves than the Whirlpool WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s) (7 shelves vs 2 shelves). The Candy CWC 150 UK/N has 2 dB more noise level than the Whirlpool WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s) (39 dB vs 37 dB). The Candy CWC 150 UK/N has 58 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Whirlpool WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s) (158 kWh vs 100 kWh). Appliance placement: Freestanding on the Candy CWC 150 UK/N, Built-in on the Whirlpool WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s). Shelves material: Chrome on the Candy CWC 150 UK/N, Wood on the Whirlpool WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s).

  • Appliance placement
    • CWC 150 UK/N:Freestanding
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):Built-in
  • Shelves material
    • CWC 150 UK/N:Chrome
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):Wood
  • Number of shelves
    • CWC 150 UK/N:7 shelves
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):2 shelves
  • Bottles capacity
    • CWC 150 UK/N:41 bottle(s)
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):19 bottle(s)
  • Noise level
    • CWC 150 UK/N:39 dB
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):37 dB
  • Energy efficiency class
    • CWC 150 UK/N:G
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):F
  • Annual energy consumption
    • CWC 150 UK/N:158 kWh
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):100 kWh
  • Current
    • CWC 150 UK/N:0.8 A
    • WHW45S2B Built-in Black 19 bottle(s):0.5 A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CWC 150 UK/N, WHW45S2B
50 specifications
Design3 differ
Appliance placementDiffersFreestandingBuilt-in
Door materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGlass
Shelves materialDiffersChromeWood
Number of shelvesDiffers7 shelves2 shelves
Door hingeKnown for oneRightUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Bottles capacityDiffers41 bottle(s)19 bottle(s)
Temperature range (zone 1)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 18 °C
Wine cooler net capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 L
Total net capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 L
ThermostatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Noise levelDiffers39 dB37 dB
Product typeKnown for oneThermoelectric wine coolerUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTouch
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LockingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Audible alarm(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 m
Lamp typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Apps supportedKnown for oneCandy simply-FiUnknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersGF
Connected loadKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85 W
Annual energy consumptionDiffers158 kWh100 kWh
CurrentDiffers0.8 A0.5 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers490 mm595 mm
DepthDiffers550 mm557 mm
HeightDiffers845 mm456 mm
WeightDiffers29 kg34 kg
Installation compartment widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 cm
Installation compartment depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source55.9 cm
Installation compartment height (min)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source45 cm
Installation compartment height (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source47 cm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers535 mm645 mm
Package depthDiffers585 mm665 mm
Package heightDiffers885 mm505 mm
Package weightDiffers32 kg39.5 kg
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wine cooler comparisons

All wine cooler comparisons