Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

Candy DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s) vs Candy CWCEL 210/NF

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 17identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Candy CWCEL 210/NF has 2 dB more noise level than the Candy DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s) (39 dB vs 37 dB). The Candy DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s) has 16 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Candy CWCEL 210/NF (153 kWh vs 137 kWh). The Candy CWCEL 210/NF has 0.1 A more current than the Candy DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s) (0.8 A vs 0.7 A). Inner colour: Wood on the Candy DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s), Black on the Candy CWCEL 210/NF. Product type: Compressor wine cooler on the Candy DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s), Thermoelectric wine cooler on the Candy CWCEL 210/NF.

  • Inner colour
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):Wood
    • CWCEL 210/NF:Black
  • Product type
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):Compressor wine cooler
    • CWCEL 210/NF:Thermoelectric wine cooler
  • Bottles capacity
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):84 bottle(s)
    • CWCEL 210/NF:21 bottle(s)
  • Noise level
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):37 dB
    • CWCEL 210/NF:39 dB
  • Annual energy consumption
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):153 kWh
    • CWCEL 210/NF:137 kWh
  • Current
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):0.7 A
    • CWCEL 210/NF:0.8 A
  • Width
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):495 mm
    • CWCEL 210/NF:400 mm
  • Depth
    • DiVino CNWQ4G84G1 Compressor wine cooler Freestanding Black 84 bottle(s):585 mm
    • CWCEL 210/NF:545 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CNWQ4G84G1, CWCEL 210/NF
46 specifications
Design1 differ
Door colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Inner colourDiffersWoodBlack
Door materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGlass
Door hingeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRight
Reversible doorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Performance3 differ
Product typeDiffersCompressor wine coolerThermoelectric wine cooler
Bottles capacityDiffers84 bottle(s)21 bottle(s)
Number of temperature zonesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Temperature range (zone 1)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 - 18 °C
Wine cooler net capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source73 L
Total net capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source73 L
ThermostatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Noise levelDiffers37 dB39 dB
Temperature (max)Known for one37 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Temperature (min)Known for one16 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Lamp typeKnown for oneLEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers153 kWh137 kWh
CurrentDiffers0.7 A0.8 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers495 mm400 mm
DepthDiffers585 mm545 mm
HeightDiffers1263 mm700 mm
WeightDiffers45 kg20 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers575 mm445 mm
Package depthDiffers650 mm585 mm
Package heightDiffers1365 mm740 mm
Package weightDiffers49 kg22 kg
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wine cooler comparisons

All wine cooler comparisons