Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

Candy CCVB 60 vs CDA FWV900SS wine cooler Built-in 18 bottle(s)

Key differences

The Candy CCVB 60 has 113.15 kWh more annual energy consumption than the CDA FWV900SS wine cooler Built-in 18 bottle(s) (313.9 kWh vs 200.75 kWh).

Annual energy consumption
- CCVB 60:313.9 kWh
- FWV900SS wine cooler Built-in 18 bottle(s):200.75 kWh

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCVB 60, FWV900SS
13 specifications	A Candy CCVB 60 View product	B CDA FWV900SS wine cooler Built-in 18 bottle(s) Model FWV900SS View product
Designidentical
Appliance placement	Built-in	Built-in
Product colour	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Performanceidentical
Total gross capacityKnown for one	57 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise levelKnown for one	35 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bottles capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 bottle(s)
Power1 differ
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	313.9 kWh	200.75 kWh
Energy usageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.55 kWh/24h
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	595 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	590 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	830 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	35 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one	38 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Interior lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.