Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) vs Hoover HWC 200 EELW/NF

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 11identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The Hoover HWC 200 EELW/NF has 11 shelves more shelves than the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) (13 shelves vs 2 shelves). The Hoover HWC 200 EELW/NF has 1 dB more noise level than the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) (39 dB vs 38 dB). The Hoover HWC 200 EELW/NF has 58 kWh more annual energy consumption than the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) (158 kWh vs 100 kWh). Appliance placement: Built-in on the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s), Freestanding on the Hoover HWC 200 EELW/NF. Bottles capacity: 15 bottle(s) on the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s), 81 bottle(s) on the Hoover HWC 200 EELW/NF.

  • Appliance placement
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):Built-in
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:Freestanding
  • Number of shelves
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):2 shelves
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:13 shelves
  • Bottles capacity
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):15 bottle(s)
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:81 bottle(s)
  • Noise level
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):38 dB
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:39 dB
  • Energy efficiency class
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):F
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:G
  • Annual energy consumption
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):100 kWh
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:158 kWh
  • Width
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):596 mm
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:490 mm
  • Depth
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):581 mm
    • HWC 200 EELW/NF:545 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CW6000T, HWC 200 EELW/NF
41 specifications
Design2 differ
Appliance placementDiffersBuilt-inFreestanding
Housing colourBlackBlack
Inner colourBlackBlack
Handle colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSilver
Shelves materialWoodWood
Number of shelvesDiffers2 shelves13 shelves
Number of doors1 door(s)1 door(s)
Door hingeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRight
Door materialKnown for oneGlassUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
Product typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCompressor wine cooler
Bottles capacityDiffers15 bottle(s)81 bottle(s)
Number of temperature zones11
Climate classN-STN-ST
Noise emission classCC
Noise levelDiffers38 dB39 dB
Wine cooler net capacityKnown for one49 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Total net capacityKnown for one49 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Freezeridentical
Built-in freezerNoNo
Ergonomicsidentical
Interior lightYesYes
Built-in displayYesYes
Display placementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceInside
Lamp typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Wi-Fi controlledKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Apps supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHoover Wizard
Cord lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersFG
Energy efficiency scaleA to GA to G
Annual energy consumptionDiffers100 kWh158 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
CurrentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 A
Connected loadKnown for one90 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Known for one124Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers596 mm490 mm
DepthDiffers581 mm545 mm
HeightDiffers456 mm1460 mm
WeightDiffers28.6 kg45 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source530 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source580 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1495 mm
Package weightDiffers30.8 kg48 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wine cooler comparisons

All wine cooler comparisons