Product comparison · 2 wine coolers

AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) vs Candy CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s)

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 11identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Candy CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s) has 1 shelves more shelves than the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) (3 shelves vs 2 shelves). The Candy CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s) has 13 L more wine cooler net capacity than the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) (62 L vs 49 L). The Candy CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s) has 13 L more total net capacity than the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s) (62 L vs 49 L). Appliance placement: Built-in on the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s), Freestanding on the Candy CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s). Shelves material: Wood on the AEG CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s), Metal on the Candy CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s).

  • Appliance placement
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):Built-in
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):Freestanding
  • Shelves material
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):Wood
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):Metal
  • Number of shelves
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):2 shelves
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):3 shelves
  • Bottles capacity
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):15 bottle(s)
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):23 bottle(s)
  • Wine cooler net capacity
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):49 L
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):62 L
  • Total net capacity
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):49 L
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):62 L
  • Noise level
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):38 dB
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):37 dB
  • Energy efficiency class
    • CW6000T Built-in Black 15 bottle(s):F
    • CNWQ4G23G1IT Freestanding Black 23 bottle(s):G

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CW6000T, CNWQ4G23G1IT
41 specifications
Design3 differ
Appliance placementDiffersBuilt-inFreestanding
Shelves materialDiffersWoodMetal
Number of shelvesDiffers2 shelves3 shelves
Reversible doorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Ultraviolet (UV) protectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Performance4 differ
Bottles capacityDiffers15 bottle(s)23 bottle(s)
Temperature range (zone 1)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 20 °C
Wine cooler net capacityDiffers49 L62 L
Total net capacityDiffers49 L62 L
ThermostatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Noise levelDiffers38 dB37 dB
Ergonomicsidentical
LockingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Temperature alarmKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Lamp typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Cord lengthKnown for one1.8 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency classDiffersFG
Annual energy consumptionDiffers100 kWh136 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
Connected loadKnown for one90 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency index (EEI)Known for one124Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers596 mm475 mm
DepthDiffers581 mm456 mm
HeightDiffers456 mm630 mm
WeightDiffers28.6 kg23.5 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source515 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source491 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source666 mm
Package weightDiffers30.8 kg25 kg
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More wine cooler comparisons

All wine cooler comparisons