Product comparison · 2 window & through-wall air conditioners

Haier ESA406K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock vs Haier ESA412K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 8identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)
    • ESA406K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:10.7
    • ESA412K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:10.8
  • Airflow (high speed)
    • ESA406K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:271.8 m³/h
    • ESA412K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:458.75 m³/h
  • Airflow (low speed)
    • ESA406K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:220.8 m³/h
    • ESA412K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:373.74 m³/h
  • Airflow (medium speed)
    • ESA406K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:246 m³/h
    • ESA412K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:424.74 m³/h
  • Weight
    • ESA406K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:21.2 kg
    • ESA412K window/through-wall air conditioner Monoblock:30.9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ESA406K, ESA412K
13 specifications
Features4 differ
Cooling energy efficiency (EER, W/W)Differs10.710.8
Airflow (high speed)Differs271.8 m³/h458.75 m³/h
Airflow (low speed)Differs220.8 m³/h373.74 m³/h
Airflow (medium speed)Differs246 m³/h424.74 m³/h
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers21.2 kg30.9 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More window & through-wall air conditioners comparisons

All window & through-wall air conditioners comparisons