Product comparison · 2 webcams

i-tec SOLOMON WH200 vs Ugreen CM678 webcam

10specifications compared
7differ
3identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The i-tec SOLOMON WH200 has 2 MP more megapixel (approx.) than the Ugreen CM678 webcam (4 MP vs 2 MP). The i-tec SOLOMON WH200 has 7° more diagonal field of view than the Ugreen CM678 webcam (92° vs 85°). Maximum video resolution: 2560 x 1440 pixels on the i-tec SOLOMON WH200, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Ugreen CM678 webcam. Camera HD type: 2K Ultra HD on the i-tec SOLOMON WH200, Full HD on the Ugreen CM678 webcam. Interface: USB on the i-tec SOLOMON WH200, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the Ugreen CM678 webcam.

Megapixel (approx.)
- SOLOMON WH200:4 MP
- CM678 webcam:2 MP
Maximum video resolution
- SOLOMON WH200:2560 x 1440 pixels
- CM678 webcam:1920 x 1080 pixels
Camera HD type
- SOLOMON WH200:2K Ultra HD
- CM678 webcam:Full HD
Diagonal field of view
- SOLOMON WH200:92°
- CM678 webcam:85°
Interface
- SOLOMON WH200:USB
- CM678 webcam:USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Product colour
- SOLOMON WH200:Black
- CM678 webcam:Grey
Mounting type
- SOLOMON WH200:Clip
- CM678 webcam:Clamp

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SOLOMON WH200, CM678
38 specifications	A i-tec SOLOMON WH200 View product	B Ugreen CM678 webcam Model CM678 View product
Performance4 differ
Megapixel (approx.)Differs	4 MP	2 MP
Maximum video resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1440 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Camera HD typeDiffers	2K Ultra HD	Full HD
Maximum frame rateKnown for one	60 fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Resolution at capture speedKnown for one	1920x1080@30fps, 1280x720@30fps, 2560x1440@30fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto exposureKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Face trackingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Diagonal field of viewDiffers	92°	85°
White balanceKnown for one	Auto	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating voltageKnown for one	5 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1080p
Design3 differ
InterfaceDiffers	USB	USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey
Mounting typeDiffers	Clip	Clamp
Sensor typeKnown for one	CMOS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Optical sensor sizeKnown for one	25.4 / 3 mm (1 / 3")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in flashKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
RotatingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tripod mounting supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tripod threadKnown for one	1/4"	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 m
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for one	Android, iOS, iPadOS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for one	ChromeOS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	130 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	50.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	55.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	106 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	USB Type-C to USB Type-A	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphoneidentical
Microphone pick-up rangeKnown for one	3 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphone direction typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Omnidirectional
Number of microphonesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More webcam comparisons

All webcam comparisons