Product comparison · 2 webcams

i-tec SOLOMON 500 vs Ugreen 35626 webcam

11specifications compared
6differ
5identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The i-tec SOLOMON 500 has 6.29 MP more megapixel (approx.) than the Ugreen 35626 webcam (8.29 MP vs 2 MP). The i-tec SOLOMON 500 has 2 K Ultra HD more camera HD type than the Ugreen 35626 webcam (4K Ultra HD vs 2K Ultra HD). The i-tec SOLOMON 500 has 30 fps more maximum frame rate than the Ugreen 35626 webcam (60 fps vs 30 fps). Maximum video resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the i-tec SOLOMON 500, 2560 x 1440 pixels on the Ugreen 35626 webcam. Interface: USB on the i-tec SOLOMON 500, USB 2.0 on the Ugreen 35626 webcam.

Megapixel (approx.)
- SOLOMON 500:8.29 MP
- 35626 webcam:2 MP
Maximum video resolution
- SOLOMON 500:3840 x 2160 pixels
- 35626 webcam:2560 x 1440 pixels
Camera HD type
- SOLOMON 500:4K Ultra HD
- 35626 webcam:2K Ultra HD
Maximum frame rate
- SOLOMON 500:60 fps
- 35626 webcam:30 fps
Interface
- SOLOMON 500:USB
- 35626 webcam:USB 2.0
Mounting type
- SOLOMON 500:Clip
- 35626 webcam:Clamp

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SOLOMON 500, 35626
39 specifications	A i-tec SOLOMON 500 View product	B Ugreen 35626 webcam Model 35626 View product
Performance4 differ
Megapixel (approx.)Differs	8.29 MP	2 MP
Maximum video resolutionDiffers	3840 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels
Camera HD typeDiffers	4K Ultra HD	2K Ultra HD
Maximum frame rateDiffers	60 fps	30 fps
Resolution at capture speedKnown for one	3840x2160@30fps, 2560x1440@30fps, 1920x1080@60fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto focusKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto exposureKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Face trackingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Diagonal field of viewKnown for one	81°	Unknown — not stated by the source
White balanceKnown for one	Auto	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating voltageKnown for one	5 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
InterfaceDiffers	USB	USB 2.0
Mounting typeDiffers	Clip	Clamp
Optical sensor sizeKnown for one	25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in flashKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
RotatingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tripod mounting supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tripod threadKnown for one	1/4"	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise-cancelingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 m
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for one	Android, iOS, iPadOS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for one	ChromeOS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	107 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	52.2 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	49.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	106 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	USB Type-C to USB Type-A	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphoneidentical
Microphone pick-up rangeKnown for one	3 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Microphone direction typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Omnidirectional
Packaging dataidentical
QuantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More webcam comparisons

All webcam comparisons