Product comparison · 2 webcams

i-tec SOLOMON 300 vs i-tec SOLOMON WH200

Key differences

Megapixel (approx.)
- SOLOMON 300:8.29 MP
- SOLOMON WH200:4 MP
Maximum video resolution
- SOLOMON 300:3840 x 2160 pixels
- SOLOMON WH200:2560 x 1440 pixels
Camera HD type
- SOLOMON 300:4K Ultra HD
- SOLOMON WH200:2K Ultra HD
Face tracking
- SOLOMON 300:No
- SOLOMON WH200:Yes
Width
- SOLOMON 300:72 mm
- SOLOMON WH200:130 mm
Depth
- SOLOMON 300:52 mm
- SOLOMON WH200:50.5 mm
Height
- SOLOMON 300:57 mm
- SOLOMON WH200:55.5 mm
Weight
- SOLOMON 300:107 g
- SOLOMON WH200:106 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SOLOMON 300, SOLOMON WH200
36 specifications	A i-tec SOLOMON 300 View product	B i-tec SOLOMON WH200 View product
Performance5 differ
Megapixel (approx.)Differs	8.29 MP	4 MP
Maximum video resolutionDiffers	3840 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels
Camera HD typeDiffers	4K Ultra HD	2K Ultra HD
Resolution at capture speedDiffers	1280x720@30fps, 3840x2160@30fps, 1920x1080@60fps	1920x1080@30fps, 1280x720@30fps, 2560x1440@30fps
Face trackingDiffers	No	Yes
Privacy cameraKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Privacy typeKnown for one	Privacy shutter	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	72 mm	130 mm
DepthDiffers	52 mm	50.5 mm
HeightDiffers	57 mm	55.5 mm
WeightDiffers	107 g	106 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C to USB Type-A

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.