Product comparison · 2 webcams

Hama C-650 Face Tracking vs Hama C-900 Pro

Key differences

Megapixel (approx.)
- C-650 Face Tracking:2 MP
- C-900 Pro:8.3 MP
Maximum video resolution
- C-650 Face Tracking:1920 x 1080 pixels
- C-900 Pro:3840 x 2160 pixels
Supported video modes
- C-650 Face Tracking:1080p
- C-900 Pro:2160p
Maximum image resolution
- C-650 Face Tracking:1920 x 1080 pixels
- C-900 Pro:3840 x 2160 pixels
Width
- C-650 Face Tracking:67 mm
- C-900 Pro:100 mm
Depth
- C-650 Face Tracking:72 mm
- C-900 Pro:63 mm
Height
- C-650 Face Tracking:53 mm
- C-900 Pro:52 mm

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of C-650 Face Tracking, C-900 Pro
31 specifications	A Hama C-650 Face Tracking View product	B Hama C-900 Pro View product
Performance4 differ
Megapixel (approx.)Differs	2 MP	8.3 MP
Maximum video resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels
Camera HD typeKnown for one	Full HD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum frame rateKnown for one	30 fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Resolution at capture speedKnown for one	1920x1080@30fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesDiffers	1080p	2160p
Maximum image resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels
Face trackingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
White balanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Auto
Designidentical
USB poweredKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	67 mm	100 mm
DepthDiffers	72 mm	63 mm
HeightDiffers	53 mm	52 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	155 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	130 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	235 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.