Product comparison · 2 webcams

Dell WB3023 webcam vs i-tec SOLOMON 200

15specifications compared
10differ
5identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell WB3023 webcam has 30 fps more maximum frame rate than the i-tec SOLOMON 200 (60 fps vs 30 fps). The i-tec SOLOMON 200 has 7° more diagonal field of view than the Dell WB3023 webcam (85° vs 78°). The i-tec SOLOMON 200 has 24 mm more width than the Dell WB3023 webcam (72 mm vs 48 mm). Maximum video resolution: 2560 x 1440 pixels on the Dell WB3023 webcam, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the i-tec SOLOMON 200. Camera HD type: Quad HD on the Dell WB3023 webcam, Full HD on the i-tec SOLOMON 200.

Maximum video resolution
- WB3023 webcam:2560 x 1440 pixels
- SOLOMON 200:1920 x 1080 pixels
Camera HD type
- WB3023 webcam:Quad HD
- SOLOMON 200:Full HD
Maximum frame rate
- WB3023 webcam:60 fps
- SOLOMON 200:30 fps
Diagonal field of view
- WB3023 webcam:78°
- SOLOMON 200:85°
Interface
- WB3023 webcam:USB 2.0
- SOLOMON 200:USB
Mounting type
- WB3023 webcam:Clip
- SOLOMON 200:Clip/Stand
Width
- WB3023 webcam:48 mm
- SOLOMON 200:72 mm
Depth
- WB3023 webcam:69 mm
- SOLOMON 200:52 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of WB3023, SOLOMON 200
39 specifications	A Dell WB3023 webcam Model WB3023 View product	B i-tec SOLOMON 200 View product
Performance4 differ
Megapixel (approx.)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 MP
Maximum video resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1440 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Camera HD typeDiffers	Quad HD	Full HD
Maximum frame rateDiffers	60 fps	30 fps
Fixed focusKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto exposureKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Face trackingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Diagonal field of viewDiffers	78°	85°
Operating voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Resolution at capture speedKnown for one	1280x720@24fps, 1280x720@30fps, 1280x720@60fps, 1920x1080@24fps, 1920x1080@30fps, 2560x1440@24fps, 2560x1440@30fps	Unknown — not stated by the source
Video formats supportedKnown for one	M-JPEG	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto focusKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital zoomKnown for one	2x	Unknown — not stated by the source
Noise reductionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
InterfaceDiffers	USB 2.0	USB
Mounting typeDiffers	Clip	Clip/Stand
Sensor typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CMOS
Optical sensor sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	25.4 / 3 mm (1 / 3")
Built-in flashKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
RotatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tripod mounting supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	48 mm	72 mm
DepthDiffers	69 mm	52 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	57 mm
WeightDiffers	151 g	107 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C to USB Type-A
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Microphone1 differ
Microphone pick-up rangeDiffers	2 m	3 m
Number of microphonesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Microphone direction typeKnown for one	Omnidirectional	Unknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 10, Windows 11	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More webcam comparisons

All webcam comparisons