Product comparison · 2 video wall processors

ATEN VW3620 CPU Module vs Matrox QuadHead2Go Q185

11specifications compared
8differ
3identical
29known for one product only

Key differences

Product colour
- VW3620 CPU Module:Black, Green
- QuadHead2Go Q185:Black
Built-in fan
- VW3620 CPU Module:Yes
- QuadHead2Go Q185:No
Ethernet LAN data rates
- VW3620 CPU Module:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
- QuadHead2Go Q185:1000 Mbit/s
Operating temperature (T-T)
- VW3620 CPU Module:0 - 40 °C
- QuadHead2Go Q185:0 - 45 °C
Width
- VW3620 CPU Module:271 mm
- QuadHead2Go Q185:14 mm
Depth
- VW3620 CPU Module:193 mm
- QuadHead2Go Q185:18.1 mm
Height
- VW3620 CPU Module:27.4 mm
- QuadHead2Go Q185:3.18 mm
Weight
- VW3620 CPU Module:780 g
- QuadHead2Go Q185:494 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of VW-CPU, QuadHead2Go Q185
40 specifications	A ATEN VW3620 CPU Module Model VW-CPU View product	B Matrox QuadHead2Go Q185 View product
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Green	Black
Housing material	Metal	Metal
Built-in fanDiffers	Yes	No
Rack mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Regulatory/environmental compliance: EMC Class A: FCC, CE, KC, RCM, VCCI
Number of fansKnown for one	1 fan(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fan locationKnown for one	Top	Unknown — not stated by the source
Heat dissipationKnown for one	9.95 BTU/h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Ethernet LAN	Yes	Yes
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	1000 Mbit/s
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100Base-T(X)
Built-in processorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Internal storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 GB
Bundled softwareKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Matrox PowerWall: https://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/products/video-wall/powerwall/
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI output ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4
DisplayPort versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
RJ-45 ports quantity	1	1
Poweridentical
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 W
Power supply locationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	External
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	0 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	271 mm	14 mm
DepthDiffers	193 mm	18.1 mm
HeightDiffers	27.4 mm	3.18 mm
WeightDiffers	780 g	494 g
Package widthKnown for one	253 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	338 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	59 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	1.08 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Taiwan	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	4.6 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	272 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	350 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	255 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Master (outer) case volumeKnown for one	24267.537529344 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package volumeKnown for one	5040.398693376 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

ATEN VW3620 CPU Module vs Matrox QuadHead2Go Q185

Key differences

Side by side

More video wall processor comparisons