Product comparison · 2 video signal converters

Marmitek Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter vs Microconnect MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 3identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Microconnect MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter has 46 mm more package width than the Marmitek Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter (126 mm vs 80 mm). The Microconnect MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter has 59 mm more package depth than the Marmitek Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter (79 mm vs 20 mm). The Marmitek Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter has 113 mm more package height than the Microconnect MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter (130 mm vs 17 mm). Product colour: Black, Silver on the Marmitek Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter, Black on the Microconnect MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter. Maximum video resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the Marmitek Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter, 3840 x 2160, 4096 x 2160 on the Microconnect MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter.

  • Product colour
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:Black, Silver
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:Black
  • Maximum video resolution
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:3840 x 2160, 4096 x 2160
  • Bandwidth
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:18 Gbit/s
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:340 MHz
  • Host interface
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:USB Type-C
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:HDMI
  • Package width
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:80 mm
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:126 mm
  • Package depth
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:20 mm
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:79 mm
  • Package height
    • Connect USB C to HDMI - USB-C to HDMI adapter:130 mm
    • MC-HDMIREPEATER4K video signal converter Passive video converter:17 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 25008369, MC-HDMIREPEATER4K
24 specifications
Features1 differ
Converter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePassive video converter
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product colourDiffersBlack, SilverBlack
Cable lengthKnown for one0.15 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Video2 differ
Maximum video resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels3840 x 2160, 4096 x 2160
Video resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
Supported video modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source480i
Supported aspect ratiosKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3:4
BandwidthDiffers18 Gbit/s340 MHz
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CHDMI
Connection to PCKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source51 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source13 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers80 mm126 mm
Package depthDiffers20 mm79 mm
Package heightDiffers130 mm17 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source26 g
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video signal converter comparisons

All video signal converter comparisons