Product comparison · 2 video signal converters

Lindy HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power vs Techly I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The Techly I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter has 67 g more weight than the Lindy HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power (110 g vs 43 g). Product colour: Grey on the Lindy HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power, Black on the Techly I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter. Maximum video resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the Lindy HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power, 720 x 576 pixels on the Techly I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter. Host interface: USB Type-C on the Lindy HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power, Composite + S-Video on the Techly I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter. Output interface: HDMI on the Lindy HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power, USB Type-A on the Techly I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter.

  • Product colour
    • HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power:Grey
    • I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter:Black
  • Maximum video resolution
    • HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter:720 x 576 pixels
  • Host interface
    • HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power:USB Type-C
    • I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter:Composite + S-Video
  • Output interface
    • HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power:HDMI
    • I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter:USB Type-A
  • Weight
    • HDMI to USB Type C Converter with USB Power:43 g
    • I-USB-VIDEO-700TY video signal converter:110 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 43347, I-USB-VIDEO-700TY
27 specifications
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one0.3 mUnknown — not stated by the source
InternalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 10, Windows 2000, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Video1 differ
Maximum video resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels720 x 576 pixels
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
BandwidthKnown for one18 Gbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
HDCPKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Video resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source720 x 480,720 x 576 pixels
Analog signal format systemKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNTSC, PAL
Audioidentical
Audio sampling rateKnown for one192 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB Type-CComposite + S-Video
Output interfaceDiffersHDMIUSB Type-A
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, REACH, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 45 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 80 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers43 g110 g
Packaging dataidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one174 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one20 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one194 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one70 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video signal converter comparisons

All video signal converter comparisons