All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video signal converters

Lindy Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio vs Vivolink VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 2identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio has 25 mm more width than the Vivolink VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter (113 mm vs 88 mm). The Lindy Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio has 8 mm more depth than the Vivolink VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter (71 mm vs 63 mm). The Vivolink VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter has 9 mm more height than the Lindy Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio (33 mm vs 24 mm). Supported video modes: 576i, 720p, 1080p on the Lindy Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio, 2160p on the Vivolink VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter. Host interface: Composite + S-Video on the Lindy Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio, HDMI on the Vivolink VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter.

  • Supported video modes
    • 576i, 720p, 1080p
    • 2160p
  • Host interface
    • Composite + S-Video
    • HDMI
  • Output interface
    • HDMI + RCA
    • HDMI
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • 0 - 70 °C
    • -10 - 50 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 10 - 85%
    • 10 - 90%
  • Width
    • 113 mm
    • 88 mm
  • Depth
    • 71 mm
    • 63 mm
  • Height
    • 24 mm
    • 33 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
41 specifications
A

Lindy

Composite / S-Video to HDMI Converter with Audio

Model 38394

View product
B

Vivolink

VL120015 video signal converter Active video converter

Model VL120015

View product
Featuresidentical
Converter typeKnown for oneActive video converter
InternalKnown for oneNo
ReclockingKnown for oneYes
Extended display identification data (EDID)Known for oneYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYes
LED indicatorsKnown for onePower
Product colourKnown for oneBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneMetal
CertificationKnown for oneCE, FCC, RoHS, REACH
Video1 differ
Supported video modesDiffers576i, 720p, 1080p2160p
BandwidthKnown for one18 Gbit/s
HDCPKnown for oneYes
Analog signal format systemKnown for oneNTSC, PAL
Audioidentical
Audio supportKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersComposite + S-VideoHDMI
Output interfaceDiffersHDMI + RCAHDMI
Video inKnown for oneHDMI
Video outKnown for oneHDMI
DC-in jackYesYes
Poweridentical
External power adapterKnown for oneYes
Input voltageKnown for one110 - 230 V
Operating currentKnown for one1 A
Operating voltageKnown for one5 V
Power consumption (typical)Known for one0.5 W
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 70 °C-10 - 50 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs10 - 85%10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 80 °C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers113 mm88 mm
DepthDiffers71 mm63 mm
HeightDiffers24 mm33 mm
WeightDiffers84 g50 g
Packaging data4 differ
AC adapter includedKnown for oneYes
Quantity11
Package widthDiffers190 mm88 mm
Package depthDiffers145 mm63 mm
Package heightDiffers60 mm33 mm
Package weightDiffers294 g122 g
ManualKnown for oneYes
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one45.5 x 75 x 12 mm
TypeKnown for oneHDCP converter 2.2 to 1.2
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85176990

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video signal converter comparisons

All video signal converter comparisons