Product comparison · 2 video signal converters

Dahua Technology DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter vs Hama 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 0identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter has 61 mm more package width than the Dahua Technology DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter (231 mm vs 170 mm). The Dahua Technology DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter has 72 mm more package depth than the Hama 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter (166 mm vs 94 mm). The Dahua Technology DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter has 28 mm more package height than the Hama 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter (65 mm vs 37 mm). Converter type: Active video converter on the Dahua Technology DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter, Passive video converter on the Hama 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter. Cables included: RS-232 on the Dahua Technology DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter, USB on the Hama 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter.

  • Converter type
    • DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter:Active video converter
    • 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter:Passive video converter
  • Cables included
    • DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter:RS-232
    • 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter:USB
  • Package width
    • DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter:170 mm
    • 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter:231 mm
  • Package depth
    • DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter:166 mm
    • 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter:94 mm
  • Package height
    • DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter:65 mm
    • 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter:37 mm
  • Package weight
    • DHI-LS-HW video signal converter Active video converter:420 g
    • 00121775 video signal converter Passive video converter:140 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DHI-LS-HW, 00121775
23 specifications
Features1 differ
Converter typeDiffersActive video converterPassive video converter
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Videoidentical
Maximum video resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1080 pixels
Video resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1080 pixels
Supported video modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1080p
Analog signal format systemKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNTSC 3.58, NTSC 4.43, PAL, PAL M, PAL N, SECAM
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSCART
Output interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHDMI
Poweridentical
USB poweredKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power consumption (typical)Known for one5 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data5 differ
Cables includedDiffersRS-232USB
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
QuantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Package widthDiffers170 mm231 mm
Package depthDiffers166 mm94 mm
Package heightDiffers65 mm37 mm
Package weightDiffers420 g140 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one126.4 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one69.3 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one31 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one370 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video signal converter comparisons

All video signal converter comparisons