Product comparison · 2 video signal converters

ATEN VC486 video signal converter vs Matrox ConvertIP DRS

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 1identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The Matrox ConvertIP DRS has 7 V more input voltage than the ATEN VC486 video signal converter (12 V vs 5 V). The Matrox ConvertIP DRS has 12.31 W more power consumption (typical) than the ATEN VC486 video signal converter (18 W vs 5.69 W). The ATEN VC486 video signal converter has 1,105 mm more width than the Matrox ConvertIP DRS (1296 mm vs 191 mm). Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 40 °C on the ATEN VC486 video signal converter, 0 - 45 °C on the Matrox ConvertIP DRS.

  • Input voltage
    • VC486 video signal converter:5 V
    • ConvertIP DRS:12 V
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • VC486 video signal converter:5.69 W
    • ConvertIP DRS:18 W
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • VC486 video signal converter:0 - 40 °C
    • ConvertIP DRS:0 - 45 °C
  • Width
    • VC486 video signal converter:1296 mm
    • ConvertIP DRS:191 mm
  • Depth
    • VC486 video signal converter:182 mm
    • ConvertIP DRS:181 mm
  • Height
    • VC486 video signal converter:287 mm
    • ConvertIP DRS:36 mm
  • Weight
    • VC486 video signal converter:650 g
    • ConvertIP DRS:665 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of VC486, CIP-DRS2
34 specifications
B

Matrox

ConvertIP DRS

Model CIP-DRS2

View product
Featuresidentical
ReclockingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Extended display identification data (EDID)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialMetalMetal
Video1 differ
Maximum video resolutionKnown for one3840 x 2160 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesKnown for one720p, 1080i, 1080p, 2160pUnknown — not stated by the source
Serial Digital Interface (SDI) standardDiffersSMPTE 292M, SMPTE 424M, SMPTE 425M, SMPTE ST-2081, SMPTE ST-2082SMPTE ST-2110
Supported chroma subsamplingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4:2:2, 4:4:4, 4:2:0
Colour space supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRGB, YUV
Maximum refresh rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 Hz
Audioidentical
Line-out balanced impedanceKnown for one75 ΩUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Host interfaceKnown for oneSDIUnknown — not stated by the source
Output interfaceKnown for oneHDMIUnknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for oneHDMI, SDIUnknown — not stated by the source
Video inKnown for oneSDIUnknown — not stated by the source
Video outKnown for oneHDMI, SDIUnknown — not stated by the source
BNC video outputKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
BNC output portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power2 differ
Input voltageDiffers5 V12 V
Operating currentKnown for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs5.69 W18 W
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C0 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers1296 mm191 mm
DepthDiffers182 mm181 mm
HeightDiffers287 mm36 mm
WeightDiffers650 g665 g
Packaging dataidentical
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Firmware upgradeableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video signal converter comparisons

All video signal converter comparisons