Product comparison · 2 video servers/encoders

LG PCS200R video servers/encoder vs Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

The LG PCS200R video servers/encoder has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder (2 vs 1). Product colour: Grey on the LG PCS200R video servers/encoder, Black on the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder. Weight: 2.56 kg on the LG PCS200R video servers/encoder, 190 g on the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder. Operating temperature (T-T): -30 - 70 °C on the LG PCS200R video servers/encoder, 0 - 40 °C on the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 0 - 95% on the LG PCS200R video servers/encoder, 20 - 90% on the Lindy 38519 video servers/encoder.

  • Product colour
    • PCS200R video servers/encoder:Grey
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:Black
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • PCS200R video servers/encoder:2
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:1
  • Weight
    • PCS200R video servers/encoder:2.56 kg
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:190 g
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • PCS200R video servers/encoder:-30 - 70 °C
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:0 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • PCS200R video servers/encoder:0 - 95%
    • 38519 video servers/encoder:20 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of PCS200R, 38519
32 specifications
Videoidentical
Maximum video resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
Maximum frame rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 fps
Video compression formatsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceH.264, H.265
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneFCC, UL, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one10BASE-T, 100BASE-T, 1000BASE-TUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Audio connector typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 mm (1/8")
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers21
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
BNC input portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
I/O terminal portsKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
RS-232 portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source160 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source130 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 mm
WeightDiffers2.56 kg190 g
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one482.6 x 43.18 x 215.9 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source213 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source181 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source77 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.02 kg
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs-30 - 70 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 95%20 - 90%
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, UKCA, REACH, RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Performanceidentical
Operating system installedKnown for oneLinux kernel 3.4Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video servers/encoders comparisons

All video servers/encoders comparisons