Product comparison · 2 video intercom systems

Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P video intercom system vs Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system

Add a product
  • 28specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 18identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system has 28.6° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P video intercom system (168.6° vs 140°). The Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P video intercom system has 1 mm more width than the Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system (101 mm vs 100 mm). The Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system has 6 mm more depth than the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P video intercom system (36 mm vs 30 mm). Optical sensor size: 25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8") on the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P video intercom system, 25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5") on the Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system. Voice codecs: G.711 on the Dahua Technology VTO3211D-P video intercom system, G.711a, G.711u, PCM on the Dahua Technology VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system.

  • Optical sensor size
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8")
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5")
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:140°
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:168.6°
  • Voice codecs
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:G.711
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:G.711a, G.711u, PCM
  • Product colour
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:Black, Grey
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:Silver
  • IK code
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:IK08
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:IK07
  • Width
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:101 mm
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:100 mm
  • Depth
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:30 mm
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:36 mm
  • Height
    • VTO3211D-P video intercom system:182 mm
    • VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system:100 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of VTO3211D-P, VTO4202F-P-S2
58 specifications
A

Dahua Technology

VTO3211D-P video intercom system

Model VTO3211D-P

View product
B

Dahua Technology

VTO4202F-P-S2 video intercom system

Model VTO4202F-P-S2

View product
Featuresidentical
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
ColourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Maximum number of cameras supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
SpeakerphoneYesYes
RFID readerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Automatic gain controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Built-in microphoneYesYes
Door station controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Motion detection functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
VoIP protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSIP, P2P, IPv4, FTP, UPnP, DNS, DDNS, RTSP, RTP, TCP, UDP
Wall mountableYesYes
Number of buttonsKnown for one1 buttonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Displayidentical
Video formats supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceH.265
Night visionidentical
Night visionYesYes
LED typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIR
Camera2 differ
Megapixel (approx.)2 MP2 MP
Supported video modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source720p, 1080p
Sensor typeCMOSCMOS
Optical sensor sizeDiffers25.4 / 2.8 mm (1 / 2.8")25.4 / 2.5 mm (1 / 2.5")
Maximum frame rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 fps
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers140°168.6°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source87.1°
Audio1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)YesYes
Noise-cancelingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Voice codecsDiffersG.711G.711a, G.711u, PCM
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, GreySilver
IK codeDiffersIK08IK07
International Protection (IP) codeIP65IP65
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium
Placement supportedVerticalVertical
Proper useOutdoorOutdoor
Outdoor unit housing materialKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Ethernet interface typeFast EthernetFast Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data rates10,100 Mbit/s10,100 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10/100Base-T(X)
Power over Ethernet (PoE)YesYes
Supported network protocolsDiffersTCP/IPSIP, P2P, IPv4, FTP, UPnP, DNS, DDNS, RTSP, RTP, TCP, UDP
Softwareidentical
Operating system installedLinuxLinux
Poweridentical
Outdoor unit power typeDCDC
AC adapter output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 A
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)10 - 90%10 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-30 - 60 °C
Door station operating temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers101 mm100 mm
DepthDiffers30 mm36 mm
HeightDiffers182 mm100 mm
WeightDiffers800 g350 g
Packaging dataidentical
Outdoor unit includedYesYes
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source400 g
Indoor unit includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Minimum order quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video intercom system comparisons

All video intercom system comparisons