Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

Owl Labs Meeting Owl 4+ vs Owl Labs Microsoft Teams Rooms Bundle

Add a product
  • 48specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 43identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

  • USB connector type
    • Meeting Owl 4+:USB Type-C
    • Microsoft Teams Rooms Bundle:USB Type-A, USB Type-C
  • Processor family
    • Meeting Owl 4+:Snapdragon
    • Microsoft Teams Rooms Bundle:Intel Core Ultra 5
  • Processor model
    • Meeting Owl 4+:QCS8250
    • Microsoft Teams Rooms Bundle:135H
  • Cables included
    • Meeting Owl 4+:AC, USB Type-C
    • Microsoft Teams Rooms Bundle:AC, USB Type-C to USB Type-A

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Meeting Owl 4+, Microsoft Teams Rooms Bundle
80 specifications
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16384 MB
Internal memory typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDDR5
Storage media typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSSD
Total storage capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source256 GB
Memory card slot(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMI output ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.1
USB connector typeDiffersUSB Type-CUSB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DC-in jackKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Displayidentical
Display diagonalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source25.6 cm (10.1")
Display resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1280 x 800 pixels
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
TouchscreenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display brightnessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source340 cd/m²
Anti-glare screenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Computer system2 differ
Computer system typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMini PC
Processor familyDiffersSnapdragonIntel Core Ultra 5
Processor modelDiffersQCS8250135H
Operating system installedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 11 IoT Enterprise GAC
Featuresidentical
Trusted Platform Module (TPM)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Trusted Platform Module (TPM) versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
Packaging content2 differ
Cables includedDiffersAC, USB Type-CAC, USB Type-C to USB Type-A
Packaging contentDiffersMeeting Owl 4+ Power adapter and line cord USB-C to USB-C SuperSpeed cable Setup Guide Table Card + Owl holder Safety/regulatory/warranty slipsheet Owl Connect card Owl Labs sticker- Owl Labs Meeting Owl 4+ MTW405-2000; - Owl Labs 16'/5m USB-C to A Cable ACCMTW300-0004; - Lenovo ThinkSmart Core + USB Controller 12WA000AUK
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one116 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one116 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one275 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one1.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one330 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one530 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one460 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one2.27 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons