All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

Lenovo ThinkSmart One + Controller vs Yealink ZVC S50-C5U-000

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 11identical
  • 38known for one product only

Key differences

The Yealink ZVC S50-C5U-000 has 0.2 more Bluetooth version than the Lenovo ThinkSmart One + Controller (5.2 vs 5.0). The Lenovo ThinkSmart One + Controller has 1 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity than the Yealink ZVC S50-C5U-000 (2 vs 1). The Lenovo ThinkSmart One + Controller has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the Yealink ZVC S50-C5U-000 (2 vs 1). Ethernet LAN data rates: 1000 Mbit/s on the Lenovo ThinkSmart One + Controller, 10,100,1000 Mbit/s on the Yealink ZVC S50-C5U-000. Processor family: Intel® Core™ i5 on the Lenovo ThinkSmart One + Controller, Intel Core Ultra 5 on the Yealink ZVC S50-C5U-000.

  • Bluetooth version
    • 5.0
    • 5.2
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • 2
    • 1
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • 2
    • 1
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • 1000 Mbit/s
    • 10,100,1000 Mbit/s
  • Processor family
    • Intel® Core™ i5
    • Intel Core Ultra 5

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
55 specifications
A

Lenovo

ThinkSmart One + ControllerView product
B

Yealink

ZVC S50-C5U-000View product
Performance1 differ
Product typeKnown for oneGroup video conferencing system
Bluetooth versionDiffers5.05.2
Number of camerasKnown for one1
Videoidentical
HD typeKnown for oneFull HD
Maximum video resolutionKnown for one1920 x 1080 pixels
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one16384 MB
Ports & interfaces2 differ
HDMI versionKnown for one2.0/2.1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers21
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers21
Headphone outputsKnown for one1
DC-in jackKnown for oneYes
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1
Network2 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi standardsDiffersWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Cameraidentical
Megapixel (approx.)Known for one50 MP
Camera typeKnown for oneTriple camera
Second camera resolutionKnown for one50 MP
Zoom capabilityKnown for oneYes
Digital zoomKnown for one8x
Privacy cameraKnown for oneYes
Privacy typeKnown for onePrivacy shutter
Displayidentical
DisplayKnown for oneIPS
Display diagonalKnown for one29.5 cm (11.6")
Display resolutionKnown for one1920 x 1080 pixels
Computer system1 differ
Computer system typeKnown for oneMini PC
Processor familyDiffersIntel® Core™ i5Intel Core Ultra 5
Processor generationKnown for one11th gen Intel® Core™ i5
Processor modelKnown for onei5-1145G7E
Operating system installedKnown for oneWindows 11 IoT Enterprise SAC
Featuresidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensington
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Camera dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one910 x 88 x 102 mm
WeightKnown for one15.7 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one1045 mm
Package depthKnown for one373 mm
Package heightKnown for one297 mm
Package weightKnown for one17.4 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Camera includedKnown for oneYes
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYes
Number of speakersKnown for one2
RMS rated powerKnown for one30 W
Microphoneidentical
Number of microphonesKnown for one8
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one135 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons