All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTR vs Lenovo ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team Rooms

Add a product
  • 32specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 19identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTR has 0.3 more Bluetooth version than the Lenovo ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team Rooms (5.3 vs 5.0). The Lenovo ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team Rooms has 1 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTR (2 vs 1). The Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTR has 2 more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity than the Lenovo ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team Rooms (3 vs 1). Internal memory type: DDR5 on the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTR, DDR4 on the Lenovo ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team Rooms. Ethernet LAN data rates: 100,1000 Mbit/s on the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTR, 1000 Mbit/s on the Lenovo ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team Rooms.

  • Bluetooth version
    • 5.3
    • 5.0
  • Internal memory type
    • DDR5
    • DDR4
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • 1
    • 2
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • 3
    • 1
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • 100,1000 Mbit/s
    • 1000 Mbit/s
  • Display resolution
    • 1920 x 1200 pixels
    • 1280 x 800 pixels
  • Display brightness
    • 340 cd/m²
    • 360 cd/m²
  • Processor family
    • Intel Core Ultra 5
    • Intel® Core™ i5

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
55 specifications
A

Lenovo

ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL MTRView product
B

Lenovo

ThinkSmart One Pro for Microsoft Team RoomsView product
Performance1 differ
Number of camerasKnown for one1
Bluetooth versionDiffers5.35.0
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYes
Number of speakersKnown for one2
RMS rated powerKnown for one30 W
Memory1 differ
Internal memory typeDiffersDDR5DDR4
Memory card slot(s)Known for oneNo
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB 2.0 Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers12
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers31
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1
HDMI versionKnown for one2.1
USB connector typeKnown for oneUSB Type-A, USB Type-C
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one2
DC-in jackKnown for oneYes
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers100,1000 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Cameraidentical
Privacy cameraKnown for oneYes
Privacy typeKnown for onePrivacy shutter
Display2 differ
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1200 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
Display brightnessDiffers340 cd/m²360 cd/m²
Microphoneidentical
Number of microphonesKnown for one8
Computer system2 differ
Processor familyDiffersIntel Core Ultra 5Intel® Core™ i5
Processor generationKnown for one11th gen Intel® Core™ i5
Processor modelDiffers135Hi5-1145G7E
Computer system typeKnown for oneMini PC
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Featuresidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensington
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one135 W
Power source typeKnown for oneAC
Power consumption (max)Known for one170 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers185 mm700 mm
DepthDiffers220 mm89 mm
HeightDiffers38 mm115 mm
WeightDiffers1.01 kg3.55 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Packaging contentKnown for oneExternal Adapter Cage + Removable Cable Management Box + USB-C to USB-C 3M Active Optical Cable + VESA Mount Bracket

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons