Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms vs Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom

Add a product
  • 41specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 37identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom has 768 MB more internal memory than the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms (32768 MB vs 32000 MB). The Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom has 80 mm more depth than the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms (220 mm vs 140 mm). Weight: 860 g on the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms, 1.01 kg on the Lenovo ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom.

  • Internal memory
    • ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms:32000 MB
    • ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom:32768 MB
  • Depth
    • ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms:140 mm
    • ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom:220 mm
  • Weight
    • ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms:860 g
    • ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom:1.01 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of ThinkSmart Core Gen 2 for Microsoft Team Rooms, ThinkSmart Core Gen 2+CTRL Zoom
44 specifications
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers32000 MB32768 MB
Displayidentical
Anti-glare screenKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceKensington
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers140 mm220 mm
WeightDiffers860 g1.01 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Packaging contentDiffersExternal Adapter Cage + Removable Cable Management Box + USB-C to USB-C 3M Active Optical Cable + VESA Mount BracketExternal Adapter Cage + Removable Cable Management Box + USB-C® to USB-C 3M™ Active Optical Cable + VESA Mount Bracket

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons