Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

Jabra Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms vs Jabra Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms

42specifications compared
4differ
38identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

Supported network protocols
- Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms:IPv4;IPv6
- Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms:(IP) IPv4, IPv6
AC input voltage
- Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms:100-240 V
- Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms:100 - 240 V
Package width
- Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms:589 mm
- Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms:866 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms, Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms
57 specifications	A Jabra Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms View product	B Jabra Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms View product
Performanceidentical
Number of camerasKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	5.2	5.2
Product colour	Black	Black
Auto framingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wall mountableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
PTZ control	Yes	Yes
Videoidentical
Maximum video resolution	3840 x 1080 pixels	3840 x 1080 pixels
Streaming capability	Yes	Yes
Picture-in-PictureKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	Yes	Yes
Echo cancellation	Yes	Yes
Noise reduction	Yes	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantity	1	1
HDMI input ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB connector typeKnown for one	USB Type-C, USB Type-A	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity	1	1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantity	1	1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports	1	1
Line-out	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm connectorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AUX outKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data rates	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
Supported network protocolsDiffers	IPv4;IPv6	(IP) IPv4, IPv6
Security algorithmsKnown for one	HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Web-based management	Yes	Yes
Cameraidentical
Camera type	Dual camera	Dual camera
Zoom capability	Yes	Yes
Digital zoom	4x	4x
Field of view (FOV) angleKnown for one	180°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal field of view	180°	180°
Vertical field of view	50°	50°
Privacy camera	Yes	Yes
Privacy type	Privacy cover	Privacy cover
Microphoneidentical
Microphone sensitivity	-37 dB	-37 dB
Number of microphones	6	6
Featuresidentical
Cable lock slot	Yes	Yes
Cable lock slot type	Kensington	Kensington
Computer systemidentical
Mobile operating systems supported	Android 13.0	Android 13.0
Other operating systems supported	Android	Android
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
AC input voltageDiffers	100-240 V	100 - 240 V
Certificates1 differ
Certified for Microsoft TeamsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	Microsoft Teams Rooms;Zoom Room;ADA	Microsoft Teams Rooms, Zoom Rooms,ADA
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Width	530 mm	530 mm
Depth	60 mm	60 mm
Height	105 mm	105 mm
Weight	1.8 kg	1.8 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthDiffers	589 mm	866 mm
Package depth	210 mm	210 mm
Package height	110 mm	110 mm
Package weight	4.19 kg	4.19 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables included	HDMI, USB	HDMI, USB
Packaging contentKnown for one	PanaCast 40 VBS;USB-C to USB-C cable (3m /9.8ft);Power supply;Wall mount;Privacy cover;1 x HDMI cable 1.83m/6ft;1 x regional power cable	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

Jabra Panacast 40 VBS Bar Only MS Teams Rooms vs Jabra Panacast 40 VBS Zoom Rooms

Key differences

Side by side

More video conferencing system comparisons