All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

HP Poly Studio X32 vs HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar

Add a product
  • 47specifications compared
  • 20differ
  • 27identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Supported video modes
    • 720p, 1080p
    • 1080p, 720p, 2160p
  • Video formats supported
    • AVC, H.264, H.265
    • H.264, H.265, AVC
  • RMS rated power
    • 10 W
    • 20 W
  • HDMI version
    • 1.4/2.0
    • 2.0
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • 10,100,1000 Mbit/s
    • 10,1000,100 Mbit/s
  • Digital zoom
    • 5x
    • 7.3x
  • Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
    • 50
    • 100
  • Pallet gross weight
    • 370 kg
    • 420 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
70 specifications
A

HP Poly

Studio X32View product
B

HP Poly

Studio X72 All-In-One Video BarView product
Performanceidentical
Number of camerasKnown for one1
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)Known for one63 dB
Video3 differ
Total megapixelsKnown for one20 MP
Supported video modesDiffers720p, 1080p1080p, 720p, 2160p
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers800 x 600 (SVGA), 1024 x 768 (XGA), 1280 x 1024 (SXGA), 1280 x 720 (HD 720), 1280 x 768 (WXGA), 1600 x 1200, 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+), 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 3840 x 21601024 x 768 (XGA), 1280 x 1024 (SXGA), 1280 x 720 (HD 720), 1400 x 1050 (SXGA+), 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+), 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA), 3840 x 2160
Maximum frame rateKnown for one30 fps
Video formats supportedDiffersAVC, H.264, H.265H.264, H.265, AVC
Audio2 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers10 W20 W
Voice codecsDiffersG.711, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.728, G.729AG.165, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.728, G.729A
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI versionDiffers1.4/2.02.0
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one2
Line-inKnown for oneYes
Line-outKnown for oneYes
Microphone inKnown for oneYes
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,1000,100 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.3bt
Security algorithmsKnown for one128-bit AES, 256-bit AES, TLS
Camera1 differ
Digital zoomDiffers5x7.3x
Diagonal field of viewKnown for one132°
Camera typeKnown for oneDual camera
Second camera resolutionKnown for one20 MP
Microphoneidentical
Microphone sensitivityKnown for one-26 dB
Number of microphonesKnown for one4
Technical details1 differ
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs50100
Featuresidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensington
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originKnown for oneMexico
Pallet gross weightDiffers370 kg420 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainable technologies and materialsDiffersContains at least 50% recycled plastic content; Fabric contains 100% recycled PET; Paper-based packaging derived from at least 70% recycled materialsContains recycled plastics; Paper-based packaging derived from at least 60% recycled materials
Operational conditions1 differ
Heat dissipationDiffers55 BTU/h65 BTU/h
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for onePoE
DC input voltageKnown for one42.5 - 57 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers576.8 mm840.2 mm
DepthDiffers66.1 mm135.4 mm
HeightDiffers74.8 mm117.9 mm
WeightDiffers1.14 kg3.3 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers118 mm920 mm
Package depthDiffers194 mm163 mm
Package heightDiffers667 mm228 mm
Package weightDiffers3 kg6.48 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneHDMI, LAN (RJ-45)
Mounting kitKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons