Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

HP Poly Studio X32 vs HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit

Add a product
  • 47specifications compared
  • 20differ
  • 27identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit has 10 W more RMS rated power than the HP Poly Studio X32 (20 W vs 10 W). The HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit has 1 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the HP Poly Studio X32 (2 vs 1). The HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit has 2.3 x more digital zoom than the HP Poly Studio X32 (7.3x vs 5x). Supported video modes: 720p, 1080p on the HP Poly Studio X32, 1080p, 720p, 2160p on the HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit. Video formats supported: AVC, H.264, H.265 on the HP Poly Studio X32, H.264, H.265, AVC on the HP Poly Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit.

  • Supported video modes
    • Studio X32:720p, 1080p
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:1080p, 720p, 2160p
  • Video formats supported
    • Studio X32:AVC, H.264, H.265
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:H.264, H.265, AVC
  • RMS rated power
    • Studio X32:10 W
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:20 W
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • Studio X32:1
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:2
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • Studio X32:10,100,1000 Mbit/s
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:10,1000,100 Mbit/s
  • Digital zoom
    • Studio X32:5x
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:7.3x
  • Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
    • Studio X32:50
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:100
  • Pallet gross weight
    • Studio X32:370 kg
    • Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit:180 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Studio X32, Studio X72 All-In-One Video Bar with TC10 Controller Kit
68 specifications
Performanceidentical
Number of camerasKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)Known for one63 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Video3 differ
Total megapixelsKnown for one20 MPUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesDiffers720p, 1080p1080p, 720p, 2160p
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers800 x 600 (SVGA), 1024 x 768 (XGA), 1280 x 1024 (SXGA), 1280 x 720 (HD 720), 1280 x 768 (WXGA), 1600 x 1200, 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+), 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 3840 x 21601024 x 768 (XGA), 1280 x 1024 (SXGA), 1280 x 720 (HD 720), 1400 x 1050 (SXGA+), 1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+), 1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA), 3840 x 2160
Maximum frame rateKnown for one30 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Video formats supportedDiffersAVC, H.264, H.265H.264, H.265, AVC
Audio2 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers10 W20 W
Voice codecsDiffersG.711, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.728, G.729AG.165, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.728, G.729A
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI versionKnown for one1.4/2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers12
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Microphone inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,1000,100 Mbit/s
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.3btUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one128-bit AES, 256-bit AES, TLSUnknown — not stated by the source
Camera1 differ
Digital zoomDiffers5x7.3x
Diagonal field of viewKnown for one132°Unknown — not stated by the source
Camera typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDual camera
Second camera resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 MP
Microphoneidentical
Microphone sensitivityKnown for one-26 dBUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of microphonesKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical details1 differ
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs50100
Featuresidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensingtonUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originKnown for oneMexicoUnknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross weightDiffers370 kg180 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainable technologies and materialsDiffersContains at least 50% recycled plastic content; Fabric contains 100% recycled PET; Paper-based packaging derived from at least 70% recycled materialsContains recycled plastics; Paper-based packaging derived from at least 60% recycled materials
Operational conditions1 differ
Heat dissipationDiffers55 BTU/h65 BTU/h
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for onePoEUnknown — not stated by the source
DC input voltageKnown for one42.5 - 57 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers576.8 mm840.2 mm
DepthDiffers66.1 mm117.9 mm
HeightDiffers74.8 mm135.4 mm
WeightDiffers1.14 kg3.3 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers118 mm340 mm
Package depthDiffers194 mm270 mm
Package heightDiffers667 mm940 mm
Package weightDiffers3 kg9 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneHDMI, LAN (RJ-45)Unknown — not stated by the source
Mounting kitKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons