All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video conferencing systems

Barco ClickShare Hub Core & TeamConnect Bar S vs Barco ClickShare Hub Pro & TeamConnect Bar M

Add a product
  • 67specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 61identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

  • HDMI output ports quantity
    • 1
    • 2
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity
    • 1
    • 2
  • USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantity
    • 3
    • 4
  • Digital zoom
    • 2x
    • 1.5x
  • Camera dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 450 x 71 x 76 mm
    • 750 x 71 x 95 mm
  • Camera weight
    • 1.5 kg
    • 2.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
72 specifications
A

Barco

ClickShare Hub Core & TeamConnect Bar SView product
B

Barco

ClickShare Hub Pro & TeamConnect Bar MView product
Videoidentical
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one1280 x 800 (WXGA), 5120 x 2160
Ports & interfaces3 differ
HDMI output ports quantityDiffers12
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityDiffers12
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityDiffers34
Buttonsidentical
Holder includedKnown for oneYes
Camera1 differ
Digital zoomDiffers2x1.5x
Displayidentical
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneProjected Capacitive (PCAP)
Poweridentical
Power consumption (max)Known for one140 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one160 W
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Camera dimensions (WxDxH)Differs450 x 71 x 76 mm750 x 71 x 95 mm
Camera weightDiffers1.5 kg2.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing system comparisons

All video conferencing system comparisons