All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 video conferencing cameras

Lenovo Huddly IQ vs Lindy 38422 video conferencing camera

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 2identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo Huddly IQ has 4 MP more megapixel (approx.) than the Lindy 38422 video conferencing camera (12 MP vs 8 MP). The Lenovo Huddly IQ has 45° more horizontal field of view than the Lindy 38422 video conferencing camera (120° vs 75°). The Lenovo Huddly IQ has 55° more vertical field of view than the Lindy 38422 video conferencing camera (90° vs 35°). Maximum video resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Lenovo Huddly IQ, 3840 x 2160 pixels on the Lindy 38422 video conferencing camera. HD type: Full HD on the Lenovo Huddly IQ, 4K Ultra HD on the Lindy 38422 video conferencing camera.

  • Megapixel (approx.)
    • 12 MP
    • 8 MP
  • Horizontal field of view
    • 120°
    • 75°
  • Vertical field of view
    • 90°
    • 35°
  • Maximum video resolution
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
    • 3840 x 2160 pixels
  • HD type
    • Full HD
    • 4K Ultra HD
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • 0 - 35 °C
    • 0 - 40 °C
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 0 - 85%
    • 10 - 90%
  • Width
    • 40 mm
    • 100.4 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
46 specifications
A

Lenovo

Huddly IQView product
B

Lindy

38422 video conferencing camera

Model 38422

View product
Camera3 differ
Megapixel (approx.)Differs12 MP8 MP
Zoom capabilityKnown for oneYes
Optical zoomKnown for one3x
Horizontal field of viewDiffers120°75°
Vertical field of viewDiffers90°35°
PTZ controlKnown for oneYes
Face trackingKnown for oneYes
Voice trackingKnown for oneYes
Camera typeKnown for oneSingle camera
Field of view (FOV) angleKnown for one150°
Video2 differ
Maximum video resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Maximum frame rate30 fps30 fps
HD typeDiffersFull HD4K Ultra HD
Supported video modesKnown for one1080p, 720p
Video formats supportedKnown for oneM-JPEG
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
USB 2.0 Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneDC
DC input voltageKnown for one12 V
Input currentKnown for one3 A
Power consumption (typical)Known for one10 W
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 35 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 85%10 - 90%
Packaging contentidentical
Power supply includedKnown for oneYes
Remote control includedKnown for oneYes
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB
USB cable lengthKnown for one1.5 m
Mounting kitKnown for oneYes
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, UKCA, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), REACH, RoHS
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers40 mm100.4 mm
DepthDiffers64 mm200 mm
HeightDiffers35 mm69 mm
WeightDiffers120 g440 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers82 mm150 mm
Package depthDiffers53 mm355 mm
Package heightDiffers52 mm125 mm
Package weightDiffers150 g1.48 kg
Package typeKnown for oneBox
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 11, Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneChromeOS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing camera comparisons

All video conferencing camera comparisons