Product comparison · 2 video conferencing cameras

HP Poly Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA vs Jabra Cam L1

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 0identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA has 750.2 mm more width than the Jabra Cam L1 (840.2 mm vs 90 mm). The HP Poly Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA has 13.4 mm more depth than the Jabra Cam L1 (135.4 mm vs 122 mm). The HP Poly Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA has 64.9 mm more height than the Jabra Cam L1 (117.9 mm vs 53 mm). Weight: 3.31 kg on the HP Poly Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA, 600 g on the Jabra Cam L1.

  • Width
    • Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA:840.2 mm
    • Cam L1:90 mm
  • Depth
    • Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA:135.4 mm
    • Cam L1:122 mm
  • Height
    • Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA:117.9 mm
    • Cam L1:53 mm
  • Weight
    • Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA:3.31 kg
    • Cam L1:600 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Studio V72 USB Video Bar No Radio TAA, Cam L1
32 specifications
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneWhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one15 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 4877 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Automatic gain controlKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Echo cancellationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Performanceidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for onePoly Lens Cloud; Poly Lens RoomUnknown — not stated by the source
Auto framingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrosoft Teams Rooms;Zoom Room
Technical detailsidentical
Pallet gross weightKnown for one420 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneContains recycled plastics; Paper-based packaging derived from at least 60% recycled materialsUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 year(s)
Logistics dataidentical
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one45121520Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers840.2 mm90 mm
DepthDiffers135.4 mm122 mm
HeightDiffers117.9 mm53 mm
WeightDiffers3.31 kg600 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one920 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one163 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one228 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one6.26 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Cameraidentical
Horizontal field of viewKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source92°
Vertical field of viewKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source65°
PTZ controlKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Videoidentical
Picture-in-PictureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Certificatesidentical
Certified for Microsoft TeamsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging contentidentical
Packaging contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceJabra Cam L1;Wall mount;AC/DC Power Adapter with Regional power plugs;USB Adapter;1 x ethernet cable 2m;1 x USB-A-C cable 0.6m

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video conferencing camera comparisons

All video conferencing camera comparisons