Product comparison · 2 video capturing devices

Ewent EW3707 video capturing device USB 2.0 vs Lindy HDMI to USB 3.0 Video Capture Device

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 4identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

The Lindy HDMI to USB 3.0 Video Capture Device has 35 g more weight than the Ewent EW3707 video capturing device USB 2.0 (48 g vs 13 g). Host interface: USB 2.0 on the Ewent EW3707 video capturing device USB 2.0, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the Lindy HDMI to USB 3.0 Video Capture Device.

  • Host interface
    • EW3707 video capturing device USB 2.0:USB 2.0
    • HDMI to USB 3.0 Video Capture Device:USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • Weight
    • EW3707 video capturing device USB 2.0:13 g
    • HDMI to USB 3.0 Video Capture Device:48 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of EW3707, 43235
42 specifications
Performance1 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 2.0USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Video capture resolution (max)Known for one720 x 576 pixelsUnknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceKnown for oneS-VideoUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for onePowerUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Videoidentical
Analog signal format systemKnown for oneNTSC, PAL B, PAL DK, PAL GUnknown — not stated by the source
Video capturing speed (PAL)Known for one25 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Video capturing speed (NTSC)Known for one30 fpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported video modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1080p
File formatsidentical
Import video formats supportedKnown for oneMPEGUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for one2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio (L/R) inKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
S-Video inputs quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Composite video inKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Component video (YPbPr/YCbCr) inKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Firewire (IEEE 1394) portsKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Software1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 10 x64, Windows 7, Windows 7 x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 x64, Windows 8.1, Windows 8.1 x64Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8
Bundled softwareKnown for oneArcSoftUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one73 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one30 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one10 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers13 g48 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for one235 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one55 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one130 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one145 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Audioidentical
Audio D/A Converter (DAC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16-bit/48kHz
Sample rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48 kHz
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 45 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video capturing device comparisons

All video capturing device comparisons