Product comparison · 2 video capturing devices

ASUS TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO vs ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture)

Add a product
  • 20specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 4identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The ASUS TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO has 60 fps more maximum frame rate than the ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture) (120 fps vs 60 fps). The ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture) has 1 more HDMI ports quantity than the ASUS TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO (3 vs 2). The ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture) has 1 more HDMI in than the ASUS TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO (2 vs 1). Product colour: Black on the ASUS TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO, Black, Silver on the ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture). Host interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) on the ASUS TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) on the ATEN CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture).

  • Product colour
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:Black
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):Black, Silver
  • Host interface
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • Maximum frame rate
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:120 fps
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):60 fps
  • USB connector type
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:USB Type-C
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):USB Type-B
  • USB version
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
  • HDMI ports quantity
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:2
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):3
  • HDMI in
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:1
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):2
  • Minimum RAM
    • TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO:8192 MB
    • CAMLIVE™ PRO (Dual HDMI to USB-C UVC Video Capture):4000 MB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TUF GAMING CAPTURE BOX-4KPRO, UC3022-AT-U
51 specifications
Performance2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Silver
InternalNoNo
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
Video capture resolution (max)3840 x 2160 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal
Memory card slot(s)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
High Dynamic Range (HDR) supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Video1 differ
Supported resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2160p30/25/24, 1080p60/50/30/25/24, 720p60/50
Maximum frame rateDiffers120 fps60 fps
Supported video modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source720p, 1080p, 2160p
Ports & interfaces4 differ
USB portYesYes
USB connector typeDiffersUSB Type-CUSB Type-B
USB versionDiffers3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2)3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
HDMI ports quantityDiffers23
HDMI inDiffers12
Number of HDMI outputs11
Audio (L/R) inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DC-in jackKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
HDMI versionKnown for one2.1Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 10
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMac OS X 10.13 High Sierra, Mac OS X 10.14 Mojave, Mac OS X 10.15 Catalina, Mac OS X 10.15.3 Catalina
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAndroid, iOS
System requirements1 differ
Minimum RAMDiffers8192 MB4000 MB
Minimum processorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntel i3 Dual Core 2.8Ghz
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneIntel® Core™ i5-6XXX or above Recommended:Intel® Core™ i7-6XXX or above AMD® Ryzen™ 5 1XXX or above Recommended:AMD® RYZEN™ 7 1XXX or above Intel® Core™ i5-6XXX or above AMD® Ryzen™ 5 1XXX or above 8GB or above (Dual-channel*) Recommended:16GB or above (Dual-channel) *You have to set your memory onUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 60 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 80%
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers105 mm151.8 mm
DepthDiffers80 mm130 mm
HeightDiffers21 mm42.5 mm
WeightDiffers161 g1.14 kg
Other featuresidentical
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source245 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source283 mm
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
User guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
QuantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package weightDiffers482 g1.64 kg
Package depthDiffers139 mm265 mm
Package heightDiffers61 mm220 mm
Package widthDiffers168 mm95 mm
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85176990
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.89 kg
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source520 mm
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.7 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More video capturing device comparisons

All video capturing device comparisons