All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 vacuums

Philips 5000 series FC9555/09 vacuum vs Philips PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum

Add a product
  • 44specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 28identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum has 901 W more input power (IEC) than the Philips 5000 series FC9555/09 vacuum (1800 W vs 899 W). The Philips PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum has 420 AW more suction power than the Philips 5000 series FC9555/09 vacuum (420 AW vs 0 AW). The Philips PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum has 22 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Philips 5000 series FC9555/09 vacuum (22 kWh vs 0 kWh). Only the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum has accessory storage. Product colour: Green on the Philips 5000 series FC9555/09 vacuum, Black on the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum.

  • Input power (IEC)
    • 899 W
    • 1800 W
  • Suction power
    • 0 AW
    • 420 AW
  • Annual energy consumption
    • 0 kWh
    • 22 kWh
  • Dust capacity
    • 1.5 L
    • 2 L
  • Product colour
    • Green
    • Black
  • Tube coupling
    • ActiveLock
    • SmartLock
  • Vacuum air filtering
    • HEPA
    • Allergy filter
  • Noise level
    • 77 dB
    • 75 dB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
76 specifications
A

Philips

5000 series FC9555/09 vacuum

Model FC9555/09

View product
B

Philips

PowerPro Expert FC9742/09 vacuum

Model FC9742/09

View product
Power3 differ
Input power (IEC)Differs899 W1800 W
Suction powerDiffers0 AW420 AW
Annual energy consumptionDiffers0 kWh22 kWh
AC input voltageKnown for one220-230 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 Hz
Power controlKnown for oneElectronic
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.5 W
Design3 differ
Dust capacityDiffers1.5 L2 L
Product colourDiffersGreenBlack
Housing materialKnown for onePlastic
Tube couplingDiffersActiveLockSmartLock
Colour nameKnown for oneInk Black
Exhaust filterKnown for oneAllergy H13 filter
Motor filterKnown for oneLifetime washable filter
Performance3 differ
Vacuum air filteringDiffersHEPAAllergy filter
EfficiencyKnown for one99.9%
Noise levelDiffers77 dB75 dB
Operating radiusDiffers9 m10 m
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)
Removable filterKnown for oneYes
AirflowKnown for one41 l/s
Maximum airflowKnown for one32.5 l/s
Ergonomics1 differ
Cord lengthDiffers6 m7 m
Dust container full indicatorKnown for oneYes
Park/storage assistKnown for oneYes
Handgrip accessory storageKnown for oneYes
Control typeKnown for oneButtons, Rotary
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers275 mm292 mm
DepthDiffers410 mm505 mm
HeightDiffers280 mm292 mm
WeightDiffers5.3 kg5.5 kg
Package widthKnown for one300 mm
Package depthKnown for one370 mm
Package heightKnown for one490 mm
Package weightKnown for one8.25 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Vacuum brushes includedDiffersUniversal brushHard floor brush
ManualKnown for oneYes
Other features1 differ
Accessory storageDiffersNoYes
Filter modelKnown for oneRelevant filter variant FC8010/02
Additional nozzleKnown for oneHard floor nozzle,Furniture nozzle 110mm, Mini-Turbo brush
Dimensions (LxWxH)Known for one412 x 280 x 280 mm
Accessories includedKnown for oneCrevice tool; Integrated brush; Small nozzle
Telescopic tubeKnown for oneYes
Additional accessoriesKnown for oneFilter replacement: FC8003/01
Standard nozzleKnown for oneTriActive+ nozzle
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one7 m
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one90%
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChina

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More vacuum comparisons

All vacuum comparisons