Product comparison · 2 vacuums

Philips PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum vs Philips PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum

Add a product
  • 50specifications compared
  • 24differ
  • 26identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum has 150 W more maximum input power than the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum (900 W vs 750 W). The Philips PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum has 5.9 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum (27.9 kWh vs 22 kWh). The Philips PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum has 1 L more dust capacity than the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum (3 L vs 2 L). Power control: Mechanical on the Philips PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum, Electronic on the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum. Type: Drum vacuum on the Philips PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum, Cylinder vacuum on the Philips PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum.

  • Maximum input power
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:900 W
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:750 W
  • Annual energy consumption
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:27.9 kWh
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:22 kWh
  • Power control
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:Mechanical
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:Electronic
  • Type
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:Drum vacuum
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:Cylinder vacuum
  • Dust container type
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:Dust bag
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:Bagless
  • Dust capacity
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:3 L
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:2 L
  • Product colour
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:Red
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:Blue
  • Colour name
    • PowerGo FC8242/09R1 vacuum:Rosewood Red
    • PowerPro Expert FC9745/09R1 vacuum:Dark Royal Blue

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FC8242/09R1, FC9745/09R1
63 specifications
Power3 differ
Maximum input powerDiffers900 W750 W
Input power (IEC)Known for one750 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Annual energy consumptionDiffers27.9 kWh22 kWh
Power controlDiffersMechanicalElectronic
Power sourceKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source
Suction powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source420 AW
Power consumption (standby)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 W
Design8 differ
TypeDiffersDrum vacuumCylinder vacuum
Dust container typeDiffersDust bagBagless
Dust capacityDiffers3 L2 L
Product colourDiffersRedBlue
Colour nameDiffersRosewood RedDark Royal Blue
Tube lock typeKnown for oneClickUnknown — not stated by the source
Wheels materialDiffersPlasticRubber
Tube couplingDiffersConicSmartLock
Dust bag typeKnown for oneS-bagUnknown — not stated by the source
Motor filterDiffers1 layer foam filterLifetime washable filter
Hose materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Performance3 differ
Dirt separating methodDiffersFilteringCyclonic
Noise levelDiffers77 dB76 dB
Operating radiusDiffers9 m10 m
AirflowKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41 l/s
Maximum airflowKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source41 l/s
Ergonomics2 differ
Cord lengthDiffers6 m7 m
Handles quantityDiffers21
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers263 mm292 mm
DepthDiffers403 mm505 mm
HeightDiffers220 mm292 mm
WeightDiffers4.3 kg5.5 kg
Packaging content2 differ
Vacuum brushes includedDiffersTurbo brushTurbo brush, Hard floor brush
Number of nozzlesKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Special nozzleDiffersMulti-purpose nozzleTriActive+ nozzle
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Accessories includedDiffers2-in-1 brush; Crevice tool; Furniture nozzleCrevice tool; Integrated brush; Small nozzle
Maximum powerKnown for one900 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Standard nozzleDiffersMulti-purpose nozzleTriActive+ nozzle
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one6 mUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More vacuum comparisons

All vacuum comparisons