Product comparison · 2 vacuums

Hoover TX50PET 011 vs Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum

35specifications compared
19differ
16identical
45known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum has 350 W more maximum input power than the Hoover TX50PET 011 (900 W vs 550 W). The Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum has 4 kWh more annual energy consumption than the Hoover TX50PET 011 (25 kWh vs 21 kWh). The Hoover TX50PET 011 has 2 L more dust capacity than the Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum (3.5 L vs 1.5 L). Dust container type: Dust bag on the Hoover TX50PET 011, Bagless on the Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum. Product colour: Blue on the Hoover TX50PET 011, Black, Blue, Grey, Violet on the Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum.

Maximum input power
- TX50PET 011:550 W
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:900 W
Annual energy consumption
- TX50PET 011:21 kWh
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:25 kWh
Dust container type
- TX50PET 011:Dust bag
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:Bagless
Dust capacity
- TX50PET 011:3.5 L
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:1.5 L
Product colour
- TX50PET 011:Blue
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:Black, Blue, Grey, Violet
Vacuum air filtering
- TX50PET 011:EPA
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:Allergy filter
Dirt separating method
- TX50PET 011:Filtering
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:Cyclonic
Noise level
- TX50PET 011:64 dB
- PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum:76 dB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TX50PET 011, FC9333/09R1
80 specifications	A Hoover TX50PET 011 View product	B Philips PowerPro Compact FC9333/09R1 vacuum Model FC9333/09R1 View product
Power2 differ
Maximum input powerDiffers	550 W	900 W
Input power (IEC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	750 W
Annual energy consumptionDiffers	21 kWh	25 kWh
Power controlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Mechanical
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC
Variable powerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design3 differ
Dust container typeDiffers	Dust bag	Bagless
Dust capacityDiffers	3.5 L	1.5 L
Product colourDiffers	Blue	Black, Blue, Grey, Violet
Colour nameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Magic purple
Tube parts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Rotary wheelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Exhaust filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Allergy H13 filter
Motor filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Washable filter
Flexible hoseKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of wheelsKnown for one	1 wheel(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of 360° rotating wheelsKnown for one	1 wheel(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dust bag typeKnown for one	EPA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance4 differ
Vacuum air filteringDiffers	EPA	Allergy filter
Dirt separating methodDiffers	Filtering	Cyclonic
HEPA classKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HEPA 13
Motor protection filterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Noise levelDiffers	64 dB	76 dB
VacuumKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.8 kPa
AirflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27.8 l/s
Operating radiusDiffers	10 m	9 m
Maximum airflowKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	27.8 l/s
EPA classKnown for one	EPA 10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable filterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Floor surfaces supportedKnown for one	Carpet, Hard floor, Parquet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Animal careKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Allergy careKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Silver ion technologyKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
Cord lengthDiffers	7 m	6 m
Handgrip accessory storageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Control typeDiffers	Buttons, Lever	Buttons, Rotary
Storage compartmentKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handles quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle typeKnown for one	Loop handle	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to empty containerKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Nozzle secure connectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions7 differ
WidthDiffers	443 mm	281 mm
DepthDiffers	300 mm	410 mm
HeightDiffers	237 mm	247 mm
WeightDiffers	4.71 kg	4.5 kg
Package widthDiffers	575 mm	320 mm
Package depthDiffers	325 mm	525 mm
Package heightDiffers	325 mm	315 mm
Weight (without accessories)Known for one	5.03 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	8.8 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
Vacuum brushes includedDiffers	Mini turbo brush	Hard floor brush
Special nozzleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TriActive nozzle
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of nozzlesKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Upholstery nozzle includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Accessories includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Crevice tool; Integrated brush
Filter modelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FC8010/02
Maximum powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	900 W
Standard nozzleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TriActive nozzle
Accessory storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Turbo brush driveKnown for one	Motorized	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 m
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More vacuum comparisons

All vacuum comparisons