Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

StarTech.com USB C to DVI Adapter vs Vivolink VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 5identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Vivolink VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter has 1 more displays supported than the StarTech.com USB C to DVI Adapter (2 vs 1). The Vivolink VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter has 105 g more weight than the StarTech.com USB C to DVI Adapter (138 g vs 33 g). The Vivolink VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter has 441 g more package weight than the StarTech.com USB C to DVI Adapter (472 g vs 31 g). Only the StarTech.com USB C to DVI Adapter has DVI output. Only the Vivolink VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter has HDMI output.

  • DVI output
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:Yes
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:No
  • HDMI output
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:No
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:Yes
  • Number of displays supported
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:1
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:2
  • Maximum resolution
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:1920 x 1200 pixels
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:3840 x 2160 pixels
  • Weight
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:33 g
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:138 g
  • Package weight
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:31 g
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:472 g
  • Master (outer) case width
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:320 mm
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:165 mm
  • Master (outer) case length
    • USB C to DVI Adapter:500 mm
    • VLUSBCHUB3 USB graphics adapter:330 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CDP2DVIEC, VLUSBCHUB3
34 specifications
A

StarTech.com

USB C to DVI Adapter

Model CDP2DVIEC

View product
Performance4 differ
USB connector typeUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB connector genderMaleMale
USB connector form factorStraightStraight
DVI outputDiffersYesNo
HDMI outputDiffersNoYes
DisplayPort outputNoNo
Number of displays supportedDiffers12
DVI connector typeKnown for oneDVI-IUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionDiffers1920 x 1200 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Refresh rate at maximum resolutionKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
USB versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
HDMI ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlack, SilverUnknown — not stated by the source
Integrated USB cableYesYes
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMetal
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one43 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one380 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one15 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers33 g138 g
USB cable lengthKnown for one0.295 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 45 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-10 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 85%Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for one124 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one177 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one19 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightDiffers31 g472 g
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCE, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data3 differ
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one200 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthDiffers320 mm165 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers500 mm330 mm
Master (outer) case heightDiffers210 mm50 mm
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84733020Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons