Product comparison · 2 usb graphics adapters

Nanocable USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter vs Nanocable USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter

13specifications compared
3differ
10identical
4known for one product only

Key differences

The Nanocable USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter has 15 mm more depth than the Nanocable USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter (55 mm vs 40 mm). The Nanocable USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter has 3 g more package weight than the Nanocable USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter (48 g vs 45 g). Package type: Polybag on the Nanocable USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter, Blister on the Nanocable USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter.

Depth
- USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter:40 mm
- USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter:55 mm
Package type
- USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter:Polybag
- USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter:Blister
Package weight
- USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter:48 g
- USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter:45 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 10.16.4303, 10.16.4305
17 specifications	A Nanocable USB-C to HDMI/VGA Converter Model 10.16.4303 View product	B Nanocable USB-C to 2xHDMI/USB2.0/PD Converter Model 10.16.4305 View product
Performanceidentical
Maximum resolutionKnown for one	3840 x 2160 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080), 3840 x 2160	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDCP versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.3
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthDiffers	40 mm	55 mm
Packaging data2 differ
Package typeDiffers	Polybag	Blister
Package weightDiffers	48 g	45 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More usb graphics adapter comparisons

All usb graphics adapter comparisons